All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
	pmorel@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-s390x@nongnu.org,
	mihajlov@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/15] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:18:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191128171832.191f2636.cohuck@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be2aece1-8879-d3d3-81ff-7bbbb8052548@linux.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 738 bytes --]

On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 17:10:38 +0100
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> On 11/28/19 4:28 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:

> > Would it make sense to hide all these changes in decode_basedisp_s()
> > instead? ... so that decode_basedisp_s() returns 0 if env->pv == true ?
> > ... or are there still cases where we need real values from
> > decode_basedisp_s() in case of env->pv==true?  
> 
> I'd like to keep decode_basedisp_s() as is, but how about a static
> function in ioinst.c called something like get_address_from_regs()?
> 
> It'll call decode_basedisp_s() or return 0.

We could do something like that; but do we ever get there for other
instruction formats as well? It feels a bit odd to single out this one.

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-28 18:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-20 11:43 [PATCH 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 01/15] s390x: Cleanup cpu resets Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:10   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:32     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:18       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 12:53   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:11     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:17       ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 02/15] s390x: Beautify diag308 handling Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:17   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:27     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:21   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 11:28     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:12     ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:20   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-21 13:53     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 03/15] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:47   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:36   ` Thomas Huth
2020-02-07  7:56     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] Header sync protvirt Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 13:12     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:17       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 05/15] s390x: protvirt: Sync PV state Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:25   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 13:43     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:43   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 06/15] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 13:43   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 11:33     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:27   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 14:25     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:28       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 14:31         ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-11-21 14:32           ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-22 13:39   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-22 13:49     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:07   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 14:20     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 07/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 13:50   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:00     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:04     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:17       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:23         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 08/15] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:07   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:29     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 15:11   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 16:38     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:45       ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-28 16:54         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 09/15] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 14:11   ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-21 14:24     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-22 13:48       ` Pierre Morel
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 10/15] s390x: protvirt: Add new VCPU reset functions Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 11/15] RFC: s390x: Exit on vcpu reset error Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:14   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 12:19     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 12:22       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 12/15] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:30   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 15:39     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 14:40   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 16:08     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:14       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 14/15] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 15:28   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-28 15:36     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:10     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 16:18       ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
2019-11-28 16:24         ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 20:08       ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 11:43 ` [PATCH 15/15] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2019-11-21 11:24   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-21 11:29     ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-28 15:30   ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-20 13:26 ` [PATCH 00/15] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Cornelia Huck
2019-11-20 13:33   ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21  9:13   ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-21  9:39     ` Cornelia Huck
2019-11-29 11:08 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-29 12:14   ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 12:35     ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2019-11-29 14:02       ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-29 14:30         ` Viktor Mihajlovski
2019-12-03 10:49         ` Daniel P. Berrangé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191128171832.191f2636.cohuck@redhat.com \
    --to=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.