From: Johannes Thumshirn <jth@kernel.org>
To: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>,
Linux BTRFS Mailinglist <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] btrfs: decrement number of open devices after closing the device not before
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:36:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191204133639.2382-2-jth@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191204133639.2382-1-jth@kernel.org>
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
In btrfs_close_one_device we're decrementing the number of open devices
before we're calling btrfs_close_bdev().
As there is no intermediate exit between these points in this function it
is technically OK to do so, but it makes the code a bit harder to understand.
Move both operations closer together and move the decrement step after
btrfs_close_bdev().
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index c565650639ee..ae3980ba3a87 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1069,9 +1069,6 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
struct btrfs_device *new_device;
struct rcu_string *name;
- if (device->bdev)
- fs_devices->open_devices--;
-
if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state) &&
device->devid != BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID) {
list_del_init(&device->dev_alloc_list);
@@ -1082,6 +1079,8 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
fs_devices->missing_devices--;
btrfs_close_bdev(device);
+ if (device->bdev)
+ fs_devices->open_devices--;
new_device = btrfs_alloc_device(NULL, &device->devid,
device->uuid);
--
2.20.1 (Apple Git-117)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-04 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-04 13:36 [PATCH v5 0/2] remove BUG_ON()s in btrfs_close_one_device() Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-04 13:36 ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2019-12-04 13:36 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] btrfs: reset device back to allocation state when removing Johannes Thumshirn
2019-12-10 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] remove BUG_ON()s in btrfs_close_one_device() David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191204133639.2382-2-jth@kernel.org \
--to=jth@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.