Re: [PATCH for-5.0 4/8] acpi: cpuhp: spec: fix 'Command data' description

[Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>]

On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 13:17:22 +0100
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 12/04/19 18:05, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > Correct returned value description in case 'Command field' == 0x0,
> > it's in not PXM but CPU selector value with pending event  
> 
> (1) s/in not/not/
> 
> > 
> > In addition describe 0 blanket value in case of not supported
> > 'Command field' value.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  docs/specs/acpi_cpu_hotplug.txt | 11 +++++------
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/docs/specs/acpi_cpu_hotplug.txt b/docs/specs/acpi_cpu_hotplug.txt
> > index 4e65286..19c508f 100644
> > --- a/docs/specs/acpi_cpu_hotplug.txt
> > +++ b/docs/specs/acpi_cpu_hotplug.txt
> > @@ -56,9 +56,8 @@ read access:
> >             3-7: reserved and should be ignored by OSPM
> >      [0x5-0x7] reserved
> >      [0x8] Command data: (DWORD access)
> > -          in case of error or unsupported command reads is 0xFFFFFFFF
> > -          current 'Command field' value:
> > -              0: returns PXM value corresponding to device
> > +          contains 0 unless last stored in 'Command field' value is one of:
> > +              0: contains 'CPU selector' value of a CPU with pending event[s]  
> 
> (2) I think we can improve the word order:
> 
>   last stored in 'Command field' value
> ->  
>   value last stored in 'Command field'
> 
> >  
> >  write access:
> >      offset:
> > @@ -81,9 +80,9 @@ write access:
> >            value:
> >              0: selects a CPU device with inserting/removing events and
> >                 following reads from 'Command data' register return
> > -               selected CPU (CPU selector value). If no CPU with events
> > -               found, the current CPU selector doesn't change and
> > -               corresponding insert/remove event flags are not set.
> > +               selected CPU ('CPU selector' value).
> > +               If no CPU with events found, the current 'CPU selector' doesn't
> > +               change and corresponding insert/remove event flags are not set.  
> 
> (3) AFAICT this is only a -- useful! -- re-wrapping.
Not sure what you are trying to say here ...

> But, since we are
> modifying this section anyway, can we replace "flags are not set" with
> "flags are left unchanged" or "flags are not modified"?
sure


> "set" is ambiguous with bit fields: it can mean "rewritten", and it can
> mean "set to 1".
> 
> >              1: following writes to 'Command data' register set OST event
> >                 register in QEMU
> >              2: following writes to 'Command data' register set OST status
> >   
> 
> Anyway, these are all superficial comments. Pick up whatever you agree
> with. Either way:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo