All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: unsafe req->rq_xprt using inside bc_svc_process() ?
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 16:20:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191206212059.GD17524@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b4bd000-13f6-bd4e-a0ea-3e4da3882135@virtuozzo.com>

On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 11:40:04AM +0300, Vasily Averin wrote:
> I've found that Trond fixed it recently in commit 875f0706acc
> "SUNRPC: The TCP back channel mustn't disappear while requests are outstanding"

Thanks for following up!--b.

> 
> On 11/29/19 5:10 PM, Vasily Averin wrote:
> >OpenVz team got complain on crash in bc_svc_process().
> >Crashed node had 15 running containers with active nfsv4.1 mounts,
> >single nfsv4.1-svc thread was processed its back-channel requests.
> >In our case nfs41_callback_svc() took rpc_rqst *req from serv->sv_cb_list
> >started its processing but found that req->rq_xprt points to already freed
> >struct rpc_xprt aka part of struct sock_xprt transport.
> >
> >Back-channel request was submitted via xprt_complete_bc_request(),
> >its processing uses req->rq_xprt reference in many times,
> >however I did not found who keeps this reference.
> >It seems sock_xprt or even whole its net namespace can be freed before bc_svc_process() will start processing of submitted back-channel request, and req->rq_xprt using is unsafe in bc_svc_process()
> >
> >Am I missed something probably?

      reply	other threads:[~2019-12-06 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-29 14:10 unsafe req->rq_xprt using inside bc_svc_process() ? Vasily Averin
2019-12-05  8:40 ` Vasily Averin
2019-12-06 21:20   ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191206212059.GD17524@fieldses.org \
    --to=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=vvs@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.