From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] autotools, autorefconf, libtoolize and non-existing m4 directory
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:30:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210143024.7b3a8bb6@windsurf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4bfdbacb2180b054d3e290355dc1ed8@walle.cc>
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:21:06 +0100
Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> wrote:
> > This is simple, and works just fine.
>
> Correct, that would work, actually, we already had that construct in the
> recipe. But as I've already said, this behaviour is very different than
> on the host. Esp. if you'd use "aclocal -i"; which I don't know if it is
> used at all. Currently there are many workarounds, all are fine. My
> intention was to make you aware of this bug; or if you already knew it,
> your opinion on it. Eg. aclocal is handling the first include path in a
> special way, but buildroot already occupies that slot.
No, I was not aware that the first include path is handled in a special
way, and that because Buildroot uses that slot, the m4/ directory no
longer gets created automatically.
In fact, aclocal's man page says:
--install
copy third-party files to the first -I directory
So indeed that's I guess how the m4/ directory gets created.
Perhaps we should use:
--system-acdir=DIR
directory holding third-party system-wide files
instead? Could you try that in the definition of $(AUTORECONF), instead
of the -I options?
In fact, it is quite worrying that aclocal -i -I/foo/bar copies stuff
to /foo/bar. Indeed, we clearly don't want aclocal to clutter
$(ACLOCAL_DIR) or $(ACLOCAL_HOST_DIR) with additional files by effect
of running autoreconf.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 10:34 [Buildroot] autotools, autorefconf, libtoolize and non-existing m4 directory Michael Walle
2019-12-10 13:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2019-12-10 13:21 ` Michael Walle
2019-12-10 13:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210143024.7b3a8bb6@windsurf \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.