From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mvpp2: fix condition for setting up link interrupt
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:58:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210145802.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210145359.GA90089@kwain>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 03:53:59PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 04:42:36PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> >
> > Today, I received an email from Willy Tarreau about this issue which
> > persists to this day with mainline kernels.
> >
> > Willy reminded me that I've been carrying a fix for this, but because
> > of your concerns as stated above, I haven't bothered submitting it
> > through fear of causing regressions (which you seem to know about):
> >
> > http://git.armlinux.org.uk/cgit/linux-arm.git/commit/?h=mvpp2&id=67ef3bff255b26cc0d6def8ca99c4e8ae9937727
> >
> > Just like Thomas' case, the current code is broken for phylink when
> > in-band negotiation is being used - such as with the 1G/2.5G SFP
> > slot on the Macchiatobin.
> >
> > It seems that resolving the issue has stalled. Can I merge my patch,
> > or could you state exactly what the problems are with it so that
> > someone else can look into the issues please?
>
> Yes, please merge your patch (the one dropping the check on
> '!port->phylink'), I've been using it for months. I answered that patch
> submission back then[1] but it seems it was lost somehow :)
>
> Thanks!
> Antoine
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg555697.html
Thanks. Looks like I never read your reply (probably got buried.)
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-24 13:18 [PATCH net] net: mvpp2: fix condition for setting up link interrupt Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-24 15:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-01-24 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-24 16:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-01-24 16:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-24 16:17 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-25 8:37 ` Antoine Tenart
2019-01-25 15:18 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-12-08 16:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-08 17:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-12-10 14:53 ` Antoine Tenart
2019-12-10 14:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-01-24 16:15 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210145802.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.