[virtio-comment] thoughts on: virtio: skipping used buffers without IN_ORDER

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

Hello!
At the moment, if a device uses multiple buffers, it has
to write out a descriptor per buffer. The only exception is
with IN_ORDER where device can skip buffers, with driver
keeping track of IDs.

IN_ORDER is however quite limited in what it can do.  It's not a good
fit for storage, and probably not for RX networking.

It's not hard to extend IN_ORDER so it doesn't apply to specific rings.
A harder question is still writing a single descriptor in this case. One
somewhat easy fix it just to allow descriptors to include multiple IDs.
E.g. address is ignored in used descriptors, we can fit 4 extra IDs in
there. For descriptors where we don't care about the length,
we can stick a couple more IDs on top of that.

I can't say it's all very elegant. Also, is that enough of a win?
We can still end up with multiple descriptors.

More thoughts?

Thanks,
-- 
MST


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/
Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists
Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/
Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/