From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Bob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: fix uninitialized memmaps on a partially populated last section
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 17:31:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191211163201.17179-2-david@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191211163201.17179-1-david@redhat.com>
If max_pfn is not aligned to a section boundary, we can easily run into
BUGs. This can e.g., be triggered on x86-64 under QEMU by specifying a
memory size that is not a multiple of 128MB (e.g., 4097MB, but also
4160MB). I was told that on real HW, we can easily have this scenario
(esp., one of the main reasons sub-section hotadd of devmem was added).
The issue is, that we have a valid memmap (pfn_valid()) for the
whole section, and the whole section will be marked "online".
pfn_to_online_page() will succeed, but the memmap contains garbage.
E.g., doing a "./page-types -r -a 0x144001" when QEMU was started with
"-m 4160M" - (see tools/vm/page-types.c):
[ 200.476376] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffffe
[ 200.477500] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 200.478334] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 200.479076] PGD 59614067 P4D 59614067 PUD 59616067 PMD 0
[ 200.479557] Oops: 0000 [#4] SMP NOPTI
[ 200.479875] CPU: 0 PID: 603 Comm: page-types Tainted: G D W 5.5.0-rc1-next-20191209 #93
[ 200.480646] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba5276e321-prebuilt.qemu4
[ 200.481648] RIP: 0010:stable_page_flags+0x4d/0x410
[ 200.482061] Code: f3 ff 41 89 c0 48 b8 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 45 84 c0 0f 85 cd 02 00 00 48 8b 53 08 48 8b 2b 48f
[ 200.483644] RSP: 0018:ffffb139401cbe60 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 200.484091] RAX: fffffffffffffffe RBX: fffffbeec5100040 RCX: 0000000000000000
[ 200.484697] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff9535c7cd RDI: 0000000000000246
[ 200.485313] RBP: ffffffffffffffff R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 200.485917] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000144001
[ 200.486523] R13: 00007ffd6ba55f48 R14: 00007ffd6ba55f40 R15: ffffb139401cbf08
[ 200.487130] FS: 00007f68df717580(0000) GS:ffff9ec77fa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 200.487804] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 200.488295] CR2: fffffffffffffffe CR3: 0000000135d48000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
[ 200.488897] Call Trace:
[ 200.489115] kpageflags_read+0xe9/0x140
[ 200.489447] proc_reg_read+0x3c/0x60
[ 200.489755] vfs_read+0xc2/0x170
[ 200.490037] ksys_pread64+0x65/0xa0
[ 200.490352] do_syscall_64+0x5c/0xa0
[ 200.490665] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
But it can be triggered much easier via "cat /proc/kpageflags > /dev/null"
after cold/hot plugging a DIMM to such a system:
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/kpageflags > /dev/null
[ 111.517275] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffffffffffffe
[ 111.517907] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 111.518333] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 111.518771] PGD a240e067 P4D a240e067 PUD a2410067 PMD 0
This patch fixes that by at least zero-ing out that memmap (so e.g.,
page_to_pfn() will not crash). Commit 907ec5fca3dc ("mm: zero remaining
unavailable struct pages") tried to fix a similar issue, but forgot to
consider this special case.
After this patch, there are still problems to solve. E.g., not all of these
pages falling into a memory hole will actually get initialized later
and set PageReserved - they are only zeroed out - but at least the
immediate crashes are gone. A follow-up patch will take care of this.
Fixes: f7f99100d8d9 ("mm: stop zeroing memory during allocation in vmemmap")
Tested-by: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.15+
Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: Bob Picco <bob.picco@oracle.com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 62dcd6b76c80..1eb2ce7c79e4 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -6932,7 +6932,8 @@ static u64 zero_pfn_range(unsigned long spfn, unsigned long epfn)
* This function also addresses a similar issue where struct pages are left
* uninitialized because the physical address range is not covered by
* memblock.memory or memblock.reserved. That could happen when memblock
- * layout is manually configured via memmap=.
+ * layout is manually configured via memmap=, or when the highest physical
+ * address (max_pfn) does not end on a section boundary.
*/
void __init zero_resv_unavail(void)
{
@@ -6950,7 +6951,16 @@ void __init zero_resv_unavail(void)
pgcnt += zero_pfn_range(PFN_DOWN(next), PFN_UP(start));
next = end;
}
- pgcnt += zero_pfn_range(PFN_DOWN(next), max_pfn);
+
+ /*
+ * Early sections always have a fully populated memmap for the whole
+ * section - see pfn_valid(). If the last section has holes at the
+ * end and that section is marked "online", the memmap will be
+ * considered initialized. Make sure that memmap has a well defined
+ * state.
+ */
+ pgcnt += zero_pfn_range(PFN_DOWN(next),
+ round_up(max_pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION));
/*
* Struct pages that do not have backing memory. This could be because
--
2.23.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-11 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-11 16:31 [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: fix max_pfn not falling on section boundary David Hildenbrand
2019-12-11 16:31 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-12-16 15:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: fix uninitialized memmaps on a partially populated last section Sasha Levin
2019-12-18 9:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-12-11 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] fs/proc/page.c: allow inspection of last section and fix end detection David Hildenbrand
2019-12-11 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: initialize memmap of unavailable memory directly David Hildenbrand
2020-01-31 3:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] mm: fix max_pfn not falling on section boundary Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191211163201.17179-2-david@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bob.picco@oracle.com \
--cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.