All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: sagi@grimberg.me, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, ming.lei@redhat.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, hch@lst.de
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/4] nvme/pci: Complete commands from primary handler
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 10:14:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191212091408.GC2399@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191209175622.1964-3-kbusch@kernel.org>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 02:56:20AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote:
> The context switch to wake the threaded interrupt handler has enough
> overhead to harm latency for low queue depth workloads. Complete one cycle
> through the completion queue in the primary handler to ensure threaded
> interrupts have no disadvantage compared to not using threaded interrupts. Wake
> the thread only if more completions remain after processing the queue
> once since that indicates a higher queue depth workload that may trigger
> frequent interrupts which would be better completed in the handler thread
> with device interrupts disabled.
> 
> Completing requests from two different contexts is safe since nvme driver
> disables entry to the primary handler when it returns IRQ_WAKE_THREAD.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> index a0138e3ca0b9..e415fadf7331 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,10 @@ static irqreturn_t nvme_irq_check(int irq, void *data)
>  	if (!nvme_cqe_pending(nvmeq))
>  		return IRQ_NONE;
>  
> +	nvme_irq(irq, data);

I think we can just open code nvme_irq here.  That also means we can
use the return value of nvme_process_cq instead of the extra
nvme_cqe_pending check above.  This also needs a good comment explaining
the scheme at least.

> +	if (!nvme_cqe_pending(nvmeq))
> +		return IRQ_HANDLED;

Including one explaining this check.

_______________________________________________
linux-nvme mailing list
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvme

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-12  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-09 17:56 [PATCHv3 0/4] nvme pci interrupt handling improvements Keith Busch
2019-12-09 17:56 ` [PATCHv3 1/4] nvme/pci: Disable interrupts for threaded handler Keith Busch
2019-12-10 15:12   ` Daniel Wagner
2019-12-10 15:28     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-12-10 15:54       ` Keith Busch
2019-12-10 16:44         ` Daniel Wagner
2019-12-10 16:57           ` Keith Busch
2019-12-10 17:11             ` Daniel Wagner
2019-12-12  9:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12 15:53     ` Keith Busch
2019-12-09 17:56 ` [PATCHv3 2/4] nvme/pci: Complete commands from primary handler Keith Busch
2019-12-10 20:00   ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-12-10 20:25     ` Keith Busch
2019-12-10 21:14       ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-12-11 17:35         ` Keith Busch
2019-12-12  0:40           ` Sagi Grimberg
2019-12-12  1:02             ` Keith Busch
2019-12-12 22:55               ` Ming Lei
2019-12-12 23:30                 ` Keith Busch
2019-12-13  0:52                   ` Ming Lei
2019-12-12  9:14   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-12-09 17:56 ` [PATCHv3 3/4] nvme/pci: Remove use_threaded_interrupts Keith Busch
2019-12-12  9:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-12 15:45     ` Keith Busch
2019-12-18  7:29     ` Ming Lei
2019-12-18 15:50       ` Keith Busch
2019-12-19  1:10         ` Ming Lei
2019-12-09 17:56 ` [PATCHv3 4/4] nvme/pci: Poll threaded completions Keith Busch
2019-12-10 17:43   ` Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191212091408.GC2399@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.