From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] execve: warn if process starts with executable stack
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 11:23:32 +0100
Message-ID: <20191213102332.GA2196@1wt.eu>
References: <20191208171918.GC19716@avx2>
 <20191210174726.101e434df59b6aec8a53cca1@linux-foundation.org>
 <20191211072225.GB3700@avx2>
 <20191211095937.GB31670@1wt.eu>
 <20191211181933.GA3919@avx2>
 <20191211182401.GF31670@1wt.eu>
 <20191212212520.GA9682@avx2>
 <20191213095634.GB2407@kadam>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20191213095634.GB2407@kadam>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, will@kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:56:34PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 12:25:20AM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > "Complain to linux-kernel" is meaningless, kernel is not responsible.
> > 
> > What the message is even supposed to say?
> > 
> 
> You could direct people to a website and then update the instructions
> as needed.

Another possibility is to just log this as a debug message, and in this
case the user can feel free to ignore it. But a warning is something that
needs to be addressed and without instructions it's hard.

Regards,
Willy