From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6181103675241268292==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Christoph Paasch To: mptcp at lists.01.org Subject: [MPTCP] Re: Cover letters for part1/part2 netdev patchsets Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2019 10:32:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20191213183235.GC9430@MacBook-Pro-64.local> In-Reply-To: 36e4c35d-924c-ba5c-e092-d3a8010fe7d1@tessares.net X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2975 --===============6181103675241268292== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for catching these! Update: =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/0] Multipath TCP part 3: MPTCPv1 (RFC 8684) supp= ort These patches depend on the "Multipath TCP part 2: Single subflow" patch set sent earlier. In this set we add the necessary code for the RFC8684-style handshake. RFC8684 obsoletes the experimental RFC6824 and makes MPTCP move-on to version 1. The MPTCP patchset exclusively supports RFC 8684. Although all MPTCP deployments are currently based on RFC 6824, future deployments will be migrating to MPTCP version 1. 3GPP's 5G standardization also solely supports RFC 8684. Also, we believe that this initial submission of MPTCP will be cleaner by solely supporting RFC 8684. If later on support for the old MPTCP-version is required it can always be added in the future. The major difference between RFC 8684 and RFC 6824 is that it has a better support for servers using TCP SYN-cookies by reliably retransmitting the MP_CAPABLE option. Thank your for your review. You can find us at mptcp(a)lists.01.org and https://is.gd/mptcp_upstream . =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Christoph On 13/12/19 - 19:28:11, Matthieu Baerts wrote: > Hi Christoph, > = > On 13/12/2019 19:19, Christoph Paasch wrote: > > Sure, here is the update: > > = > > =3D=3D=3D=3D > > = > > Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/0] Multipath TCP part 3: MPTCPv1 (RFC 8684) = support > > = > > These patches depend on the "Multipath TCP part 2: Single subflow" > > patch set sent earlier. > > = > > In this set we add the necessary code for the RFC8684-style handshake. > > RFC8684 obsoletes the experimental RFC6824 and makes MPTCP move-on the > = > I think a word is missing at the end here, maybe: > = > (...) makes MPTCP move onto version 1. > = > or "move-on to version 1"? > = > > version 1. > > = > > The MPTCP patchset exclusively supports RFC 8684. Although all MPTCP > > deploiments are currently based on RFC 6824, future deploiments will be > = > Small detail: s/deploiments/deployments/g (2 times) > = > The rest is good, thank you for the update! :) > = > Cheers, > Matt > -- = > Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer > matthieu.baerts(a)tessares.net > Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions > www.tessares.net > 1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium --===============6181103675241268292==--