From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (yocto-www.yoctoproject.org [140.211.169.56]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.2074.1576553286744180212 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:28:11 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@stusta.de header.s=default header.b=mTu1NUsh; spf=neutral (domain: stusta.de, ip: 140.211.169.56, mailfrom: bunk@stusta.de) Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 47B08E01257; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:28:06 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.7 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, low * trust * [141.84.69.5 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from mail.stusta.mhn.de (mail.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4305FE00963 for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 19:28:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.stusta.mhn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47cNrH70v0zCK; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 04:27:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stusta.de; s=default; t=1576553280; bh=/iFR6zbfRINBkpQ9D7w7oCpvYN/JFhxPIzE0qFjDfzw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mTu1NUshvuNcxbKCUz+/iDQ5VQjkGE+fjOrfHeP9lheeNvDInlLrmAq6X+RsnCQPF co5HQcEUAQO5ftlZDk86JK3mmmsp4d6QHydHL03sJ+kSuFPDGC3I53AxPmeMx6lVfy 0uvUUaCtCtOGw94iGNst0wwaCkoQQOLA/MUY/3t6nuMUxeeVEgXE06nwwKZ78SKJfB DnK9k0tqtN6uArh+/Yp3MY9r+8fG/RxbNfHClWNa1rXmhMGAZO1X/5w93L4RnR9Ifu TT+WWFvfBPb3+PLJJ8p67T216vkiuhnmcrHtcMr0eLw9+z9Wxg+X9yW2dxNOXK/fZW NMoXlyR0S54XGo+e6oYG9w3o6pl703NuImpBAUl2/kBeqqTNIxBAPeq62oTpgCljGa yGvm0ZNhr3FUyGHcPWtUfipi3fsckgfqH/AXDRJUidlUX/+RP1oH44kZ8VCUwzr9wl 2MuBt3VIRlwrtZ6aHlLtz2GEjlysstKOnMhSGCobMIlGwXy3ErbbQ6UvnjTjM0laKn On3Ze1vaK89LmCXF4UZqfGFmKsnh9v41mnytjzL2b6E0Qoi/trwjGO+IzXLJ2ajy0B MQf7xbUwXPDTzTnv5mqfMwihWmIdUnWlQFG1jH0J9CcFGr0GK6glbfAIdj18A0YaVF leIsjfvxcYsgNQfuffj7LCLE= Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:27:56 +0200 From: "Adrian Bunk" To: akuster808 , Richard Purdie , poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [poky] [meta-poky][PATCH] poky.conf: Debian 8 is no longer supported Message-ID: <20191217032756.GA32000@localhost> References: <20191216040627.29272-1-bunk@stusta.de> <9dfc6360e37ff298058ae89a9ca289dc973c3b32.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <0f4abf32-abc4-8413-3e6b-600f3cf7c1f4@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0f4abf32-abc4-8413-3e6b-600f3cf7c1f4@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 04:06:22PM -0800, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 12/16/19 3:55 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-12-16 at 06:06 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> Upstream LTS EOL will be June 2020, > >> and Python 3.4 is now too old for bitbake. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk > >> --- > >> meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf | 1 - > >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf b/meta- > >> poky/conf/distro/poky.conf > >> index 8a0f28a863..995dd826ac 100644 > >> --- a/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf > >> +++ b/meta-poky/conf/distro/poky.conf > >> @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS ?= " \ > >> fedora-29 \n \ > >> fedora-30 \n \ > >> centos-7 \n \ > >> - debian-8 \n \ > >> debian-9 \n \ > >> debian-10 \n \ > >> opensuseleap-15.1 \n \ > > We still have such a worker in the autobuilder right now as it can work > > using our buildtools tarball... > > Is there a recommend process we should consult when adding or > subtracting host support for the project? And what does "SANITY_TESTED_DISTROS" actually mean? If this might require the buildtools tarball, the next issue is that there is not yet an aarch64 buildtools tarball available in stable series supporting aarch64 hosts. > - armin cu Adrian