From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serdev: fix builds with CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS=m
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:38:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191218093806.GK22665@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191218092958.tu6n452zwbpkreks@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 10:29:58AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 10:06:06AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 09:38:42AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Commit 54edb425346a ("serdev: simplify Makefile") broke builds with
> > > serdev configured as module. I don't understand it completely yet, but
> > > it seems that
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS) += serdev/
> > >
> > > in drivers/tty/Makefile with CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS=m doesn't result in
> > > code that is added using obj-y in drivers/tty/serdev/Makefile being
> > > compiled. So instead of dropping $(CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS) in serdev's
> > > Makefile, drop it in drivers/tty/Makefile.
> >
> > Why not simply revert the offending patch? There are some dependencies
> > here related to how the tty layer is built. If you're still not certain
> > on why things broke, I suggest just reverting for now.
>
> I see that it is not easy to define what obj-y should do in a Makefile
> that is included via obj-m. Now it is the other way round and that
> should be safe. This construct is used in several places, so I'd say the
> patch is fine unless you have more concrete concerns.
No, and I don't have time to look into this right now.
It's more about the general principle that a patch should do one thing;
in this case unbreak the build. If you want to do cleanups as well, you
do that separately (and argue for why its needed).
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-18 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-18 2:51 [tty:tty-testing 16/73] ERROR: "__serdev_device_driver_register" [drivers/gnss/gnss-mtk.ko] undefined! kbuild test robot
2019-12-18 2:51 ` kbuild test robot
2019-12-18 8:38 ` [PATCH] serdev: fix builds with CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS=m Uwe Kleine-König
2019-12-18 9:06 ` Johan Hovold
2019-12-18 9:29 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-12-18 9:38 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2019-12-18 10:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2019-12-18 12:51 ` Johan Hovold
2019-12-18 17:23 ` kbuild obj-m directory descend (was: Re: [PATCH] serdev: fix builds with CONFIG_SERIAL_DEV_BUS=m) Johan Hovold
2019-12-19 2:00 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-12-19 8:18 ` Johan Hovold
2019-12-19 8:55 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-12-19 9:49 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191218093806.GK22665@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.