From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Siddharth Kapoor <ksiddharth@google.com>,
lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel panic on Google Pixel devices due to regulator patch
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:03:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191218170304.GI3219@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191218162424.GA482612@kroah.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1119 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 05:24:24PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 04:18:06PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > What you appear to have caught here is an interaction with some
> > unreviewed vendor code - how much of that is going on in the vendor
> > trees you're not testing? If we want to encourage people to pull in
> > stable we should be paying attention to that sort of stuff.
> I get weekly merge reports from all of the major SoC vendors when they
> pull these releases into their tree and run through their full suite of
> tests. So I am paying attention to this type of thing.
Are you sure you're not just definining major SoC vendors as being
people who send you reports here? :P In any case, that's only going to
cover a limited subset of potential drivers and subsystems, devices that
don't appear on reference designs aren't going to get any coverage at
all that way for example.
> What I need to figure out here is what is going wrong and why the SoC's
> testing did not catch this. That's going to take a bit longer...
There's a reasonable chance this is something board specific.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-18 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAJRo92+eD9F6Q60yVY2PfwaPWO_8Dts8QwH7mhpJaem7SpLihg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-12-18 11:34 ` Kernel panic on Google Pixel devices due to regulator patch Mark Brown
2019-12-18 12:21 ` Greg KH
2019-12-18 13:11 ` Mark Brown
2019-12-18 14:22 ` Greg KH
2019-12-18 16:18 ` Mark Brown
2019-12-18 16:24 ` Greg KH
2019-12-18 17:03 ` Mark Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191218170304.GI3219@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ksiddharth@google.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.