From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@suse.cz>
Cc: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@qperret.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:34:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191218193429.GH11457@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d1b776d8e797224e92952a4d590a625@suse.cz>
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 12:57:46PM +0100, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 Nov 2019 at 13:46:49 (+0100), Giovanni Gherdovich wrote:
> > I see above that you enable the static key (and therefore frequency
> > invariance before setting the max frequency ratio (if possible) and
> > before you initialise the counter references. Is there any reason for
> > doing this?
> This is a fair point; mine was a deliberate choice but you're the second
> person making this remark (Peter Zijlstra also suggested I find the max
> frequency before I set the static key), so it appears this design is
> unpopular
> enough to warrant a change in v5.
You actually 'fix' this in the next patch. I thought it was a patch
management 'fail' that it didn't end up in this patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-18 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 12:46 [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for frequency invariance for (some) x86 Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-24 7:49 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-25 8:16 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-25 9:16 ` Mel Gorman
2019-11-25 16:06 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-26 5:59 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-26 15:20 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-27 7:32 ` Doug Smythies
2019-11-28 22:48 ` Doug Smythies
2019-12-19 10:48 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-23 7:47 ` Doug Smythies
2019-12-23 14:07 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-23 14:40 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-23 16:34 ` Doug Smythies
2019-12-23 19:10 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-24 1:16 ` Doug Smythies
2019-12-24 11:08 ` Qais Yousef
2019-12-02 16:34 ` Ionela Voinescu
2019-12-06 11:57 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-12-18 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-12-19 20:27 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance on SKYLAKE_X Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-12-18 20:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 20:29 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance on XEON_PHI_KNL/KNM Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-12-18 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 20:32 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance on ATOM_GOLDMONT* Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] x86,sched: Add support for frequency invariance on ATOM Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 16:50 ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-11-15 10:34 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-11-13 12:46 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] x86: intel_pstate: handle runtime turbo disablement/enablement in freq. invariance Giovanni Gherdovich
2019-12-18 20:37 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] Add support for frequency invariance for (some) x86 Peter Zijlstra
2019-12-19 20:33 ` Giovanni Gherdovich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191218193429.GH11457@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=dsmythies@telus.net \
--cc=ggherdovich@suse.cz \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=qperret@qperret.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.