All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "fujita.yuya@fujitsu.com" <fujita.yuya@fujitsu.com>
Cc: 'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@infradead.org>,
	'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@redhat.com>,
	'Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo' <acme@kernel.org>,
	'Jiri Olsa' <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fix variable name's inconsistency in hists__for_each macro
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:51:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191219085106.GA8141@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OSAPR01MB1588E1C47AC22043175DE1B2E8520@OSAPR01MB1588.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 08:08:32AM +0000, fujita.yuya@fujitsu.com wrote:
> From: Yuya Fujita <fujita.yuya@fujitsu.com>
> 
> Variable names are inconsistent in hists__for_each macro.
> Due to this inconsistency, the macro replaces its second argument with "fmt" 
> regardless of its original name.
> So far it works because only "fmt" is passed to the second argument.

hum, I think it works because all the instances that use these macros
have 'fmt' variable passed in

> However, this behavior is not expected and should be fixed.
> 
> Fixes: f0786af536bb ("perf hists: Introduce hists__for_each_format macro")
> Fixes: aa6f50af822a ("perf hists: Introduce hists__for_each_sort_list macro")

nice ;-)

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka

> Signed-off-by: Yuya Fujita <fujita.yuya@fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/hist.h |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.h b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> index 4528690..0aa63ae 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.h
> @@ -339,10 +339,10 @@ static inline void perf_hpp__prepend_sort_field(struct perf_hpp_fmt *format)
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(format, tmp, &(_list)->sorts, sort_list)
>  
>  #define hists__for_each_format(hists, format) \
> -	perf_hpp_list__for_each_format((hists)->hpp_list, fmt)
> +	perf_hpp_list__for_each_format((hists)->hpp_list, format)
>  
>  #define hists__for_each_sort_list(hists, format) \
> -	perf_hpp_list__for_each_sort_list((hists)->hpp_list, fmt)
> +	perf_hpp_list__for_each_sort_list((hists)->hpp_list, format)
>  
>  extern struct perf_hpp_fmt perf_hpp__format[];
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-19  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-19  8:08 [PATCH] perf tools: Fix variable name's inconsistency in hists__for_each macro fujita.yuya
2019-12-19  8:51 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-12-19 16:54   ` 'Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo'
2019-12-19 21:45     ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191219085106.GA8141@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=fujita.yuya@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.