Re: [Patch v6 6/7] thermal/cpu-cooling: Update thermal pressure in case of a maximum frequency capping

[Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>]

On Wednesday 11 Dec 2019 at 23:11:47 (-0500), Thara Gopinath wrote:
[...]
> @@ -430,6 +430,10 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>  				 unsigned long state)
>  {
>  	struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_cdev = cdev->devdata;
> +	struct cpumask *cpus;
> +	unsigned int frequency;
> +	unsigned long capacity;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/* Request state should be less than max_level */
>  	if (WARN_ON(state > cpufreq_cdev->max_level))
> @@ -441,8 +445,19 @@ static int cpufreq_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
>  
>  	cpufreq_cdev->cpufreq_state = state;
>  
> -	return freq_qos_update_request(&cpufreq_cdev->qos_req,
> -				get_state_freq(cpufreq_cdev, state));
> +	frequency = get_state_freq(cpufreq_cdev, state);
> +
> +	ret = freq_qos_update_request(&cpufreq_cdev->qos_req, frequency);
> +
> +	if (ret > 0) {
> +		cpus = cpufreq_cdev->policy->cpus;
> +		capacity = frequency *
> +				arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(cpus));
> +		capacity /= cpufreq_cdev->policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> +		arch_set_thermal_pressure(cpus, capacity);

Given that you already get a CPU's capacity (orig) here, why don't
you pass thermal pressure directly to arch_set_thermal_pressure,
rather than passing the capped capacity and subtracting it later from
the same CPU capacity (arch_scale_cpu_capacity)?

If my math is correct this would work nicely:
                pressure = cpufreq_cdev->policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
		pressure -= frequency;
		pressure *= arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpumask_first(cpus);
		pressure /= cpufreq_cdev->policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;

Thanks,
Ionela.

> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /* Bind cpufreq callbacks to thermal cooling device ops */
> -- 
> 2.1.4
>