All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [linux-review:UPDATE-20191230-115028/Chao-Yu/erofs-convert-to-use-the-new-mount-fs_context-api/20191226-103037 1/1] fs/erofs/super.c:231:34: error: macro "fsparam_enum" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 17:22:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191230092221.GA227912@architecture4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201912301604.NkmWDLSG%lkp@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4173 bytes --]

Hi,

This version is not based on linux mainline or linux-next.
It is based on the following branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs.git -b untested.fs_parse

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 04:51:51PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> tree:   https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/UPDATE-20191230-115028/Chao-Yu/erofs-convert-to-use-the-new-mount-fs_context-api/20191226-103037
> head:   3e0e36f521c53a827ec6001cf794964a0a64aaa9
> commit: 3e0e36f521c53a827ec6001cf794964a0a64aaa9 [1/1] erofs: convert to use the new mount fs_context api
> config: m68k-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
> reproduce:
>         wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>         git checkout 3e0e36f521c53a827ec6001cf794964a0a64aaa9
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k 
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> >> fs/erofs/super.c:231:34: error: macro "fsparam_enum" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2
>            erofs_param_cache_strategy),
>                                      ^
> >> fs/erofs/super.c:230:2: error: 'fsparam_enum' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'fs_param_is_enum'?
>      fsparam_enum("cache_strategy", Opt_cache_strategy,
>      ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>      fs_param_is_enum
>    fs/erofs/super.c: In function 'erofs_fc_parse_param':
> >> fs/erofs/super.c:242:21: error: passing argument 2 of 'fs_parse' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>      opt = fs_parse(fc, erofs_fs_parameters, param, &result);
>                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    In file included from fs/erofs/super.c:14:0:
>    include/linux/fs_parser.h:84:12: note: expected 'const struct fs_parameter_description *' but argument is of type 'const struct fs_parameter_spec *'
>     extern int fs_parse(struct fs_context *fc,
>                ^~~~~~~~
>    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> vim +/fsparam_enum +231 fs/erofs/super.c
> 
>    226	
>    227	static const struct fs_parameter_spec erofs_fs_parameters[] = {
>    228		fsparam_flag_no("user_xattr",	Opt_user_xattr),
>    229		fsparam_flag_no("acl",		Opt_acl),
>  > 230		fsparam_enum("cache_strategy",	Opt_cache_strategy,
>  > 231			     erofs_param_cache_strategy),
>    232		{}
>    233	};
>    234	
>    235	static int erofs_fc_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc,
>    236					struct fs_parameter *param)
>    237	{
>    238		struct erofs_sb_info *sbi __maybe_unused = fc->s_fs_info;
>    239		struct fs_parse_result result;
>    240		int opt;
>    241	
>  > 242		opt = fs_parse(fc, erofs_fs_parameters, param, &result);
>    243		if (opt < 0)
>    244			return opt;
>    245	
>    246		switch (opt) {
>    247		case Opt_user_xattr:
>    248	#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_XATTR
>    249			if (result.boolean)
>    250				set_opt(sbi, XATTR_USER);
>    251			else
>    252				clear_opt(sbi, XATTR_USER);
>    253	#else
>    254			errorfc(fc, "user_xattr options not supported");
>    255	#endif
>    256			break;
>    257		case Opt_acl:
>    258	#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_POSIX_ACL
>    259			if (result.boolean)
>    260				set_opt(sbi, POSIX_ACL);
>    261			else
>    262				clear_opt(sbi, POSIX_ACL);
>    263	#else
>    264			errorfc(fc, "acl options not supported");
>    265	#endif
>    266			break;
>    267		case Opt_cache_strategy:
>    268	#ifdef CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP
>    269			sbi->cache_strategy = result.uint_32;
>    270	#else
>    271			errorfc(fc, "compression not supported, cache_strategy ignored");
>    272	#endif
>    273			break;
>    274		default:
>    275			return -ENOPARAM;
>    276		}
>    277		return 0;
>    278	}
>    279	
> 
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all(a)lists.01.org Intel Corporation


      reply	other threads:[~2019-12-30  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-30  8:51 [linux-review:UPDATE-20191230-115028/Chao-Yu/erofs-convert-to-use-the-new-mount-fs_context-api/20191226-103037 1/1] fs/erofs/super.c:231:34: error: macro "fsparam_enum" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 kbuild test robot
2019-12-30  9:22 ` Gao Xiang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191230092221.GA227912@architecture4 \
    --to=gaoxiang25@huawei.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.