All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: allocate tags in batches
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 10:18:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191231021834.GA20062@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191230181442.4460-5-axboe@kernel.dk>

Hi Jens,

On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 11:14:43AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Instead of grabbing tags one by one, grab a batch and store the local
> cache in the software queue. Then subsequent tag allocations can just
> grab free tags from there, without having to hit the shared tag map.
> 
> We flush these batches out if we run out of tags on the hardware queue.
> The intent here is this should rarely happen.
> 
> This works very well in practice, with anywhere from 40-60 batch counts
> seen regularly in testing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq-debugfs.c |  18 +++++++
>  block/blk-mq-tag.c     | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  block/blk-mq.c         |  13 ++++-
>  block/blk-mq.h         |   5 ++
>  4 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> index b3f2ba483992..fcd6f7ce80cc 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-debugfs.c
> @@ -659,6 +659,23 @@ CTX_RQ_SEQ_OPS(default, HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT);
>  CTX_RQ_SEQ_OPS(read, HCTX_TYPE_READ);
>  CTX_RQ_SEQ_OPS(poll, HCTX_TYPE_POLL);
>  
> +static ssize_t ctx_tag_hit_write(void *data, const char __user *buf,
> +				    size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = data;
> +
> +	ctx->tag_hit = ctx->tag_refill = 0;
> +	return count;
> +}
> +
> +static int ctx_tag_hit_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
> +{
> +	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = data;
> +
> +	seq_printf(m, "hit=%lu refills=%lu, tags=%lx, tag_offset=%u\n", ctx->tag_hit, ctx->tag_refill, ctx->tags, ctx->tag_offset);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int ctx_dispatched_show(void *data, struct seq_file *m)
>  {
>  	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = data;
> @@ -800,6 +817,7 @@ static const struct blk_mq_debugfs_attr blk_mq_debugfs_ctx_attrs[] = {
>  	{"read_rq_list", 0400, .seq_ops = &ctx_read_rq_list_seq_ops},
>  	{"poll_rq_list", 0400, .seq_ops = &ctx_poll_rq_list_seq_ops},
>  	{"dispatched", 0600, ctx_dispatched_show, ctx_dispatched_write},
> +	{"tag_hit", 0600, ctx_tag_hit_show, ctx_tag_hit_write},
>  	{"merged", 0600, ctx_merged_show, ctx_merged_write},
>  	{"completed", 0600, ctx_completed_show, ctx_completed_write},
>  	{},
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> index fbacde454718..3b5269bc4e36 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,101 @@ static int __blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>  		return __sbitmap_queue_get(bt);
>  }
>  
> +static void blk_mq_tag_flush_batches(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
> +{
> +	struct sbitmap_queue *bt = &hctx->tags->bitmap_tags;
> +	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * we could potentially add a ctx map for this, but probably not
> +	 * worth it. better to ensure that we rarely (or never) get into
> +	 * the need to flush ctx tag batches.
> +	 */
> +	hctx_for_each_ctx(hctx, ctx, i) {
> +		unsigned long mask;
> +		unsigned int offset;
> +
> +		if (!ctx->tags)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +		mask = ctx->tags;
> +		offset = ctx->tag_offset;
> +		ctx->tags = 0;
> +		ctx->tag_offset = -1;
> +		spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +
> +		if (mask)
> +			__sbitmap_queue_clear_batch(bt, offset, mask);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void blk_mq_tag_queue_flush_batches(struct request_queue *q)
> +{
> +	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i)
> +		blk_mq_tag_flush_batches(hctx);
> +}
> +
> +static int blk_mq_get_tag_batch(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
> +{
> +	struct blk_mq_tags *tags = blk_mq_tags_from_data(data);
> +	struct sbitmap_queue *bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
> +	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = data->ctx;
> +	int tag, cpu;
> +
> +	if (!ctx)
> +		return -1;
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +
> +	/* bad luck if we got preempted coming in here, should be rare */
> +	cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +	if (unlikely(ctx->cpu != cpu)) {
> +		ctx = data->ctx = __blk_mq_get_ctx(data->q, cpu);
> +		data->hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(data->q, data->cmd_flags, ctx);

When blk_mq_get_tag_batch is called for getting driver tag, rq->mq_hctx
has been bound to the current request in blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(), so looks
we shouldn't change hctx here.

> +		tags = blk_mq_tags_from_data(data);
> +		bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->tag_offset != -1 && !ctx->tags)) {
> +		printk("hit=%lu, refill=%lun", ctx->tag_hit,  ctx->tag_refill);
> +		ctx->tag_offset = -1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* if offset is != -1, we have a tag cache. grab first free one */
> +	if (ctx->tag_offset != -1) {
> +get_tag:
> +		ctx->tag_hit++;
> +
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(!ctx->tags);
> +
> +		tag = __ffs(ctx->tags);
> +		__clear_bit(tag, &ctx->tags);
> +		tag += ctx->tag_offset;
> +		if (!ctx->tags)
> +			ctx->tag_offset = -1;
> +out:
> +		spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
> +		preempt_enable();
> +		return tag;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* no current tag cache, attempt to refill a batch */
> +	if (!__sbitmap_queue_get_batch(bt, &ctx->tag_offset, &ctx->tags)) {
> +		ctx->tag_refill++;
> +		goto get_tag;
> +	}
> +
> +	tag = -1;
> +	goto out;
> +}
> +
>  unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
>  {
>  	struct blk_mq_tags *tags = blk_mq_tags_from_data(data);
> @@ -116,8 +211,13 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
>  		bt = &tags->breserved_tags;
>  		tag_offset = 0;
>  	} else {
> -		bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
>  		tag_offset = tags->nr_reserved_tags;
> +
> +		tag = blk_mq_get_tag_batch(data);
> +		if (tag != -1)
> +			goto found_tag;
> +
> +		bt = &tags->bitmap_tags;
>  	}
>  
>  	tag = __blk_mq_get_tag(data, bt);
> @@ -146,6 +246,9 @@ unsigned int blk_mq_get_tag(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data)
>  		if (tag != -1)
>  			break;
>  
> +		if (!(data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED))
> +			blk_mq_tag_flush_batches(data->hctx);
> +
>  		sbitmap_prepare_to_wait(bt, ws, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>  
>  		tag = __blk_mq_get_tag(data, bt);
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 3c71d52b6401..9eeade7736eb 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -276,6 +276,9 @@ static struct request *blk_mq_rq_ctx_init(struct blk_mq_alloc_data *data,
>  	struct request *rq = tags->static_rqs[tag];
>  	req_flags_t rq_flags = 0;
>  
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!rq))
> +		printk("no rq for tag %u\n", tag);
> +
>  	if (data->flags & BLK_MQ_REQ_INTERNAL) {
>  		rq->tag = -1;
>  		rq->internal_tag = tag;
> @@ -2358,6 +2361,9 @@ static void blk_mq_init_cpu_queues(struct request_queue *q,
>  		struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
>  		int k;
>  
> +		__ctx->tags = 0;
> +		__ctx->tag_offset = -1;
> +
>  		__ctx->cpu = i;
>  		spin_lock_init(&__ctx->lock);
>  		for (k = HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT; k < HCTX_MAX_TYPES; k++)
> @@ -2447,6 +2453,8 @@ static void blk_mq_map_swqueue(struct request_queue *q)
>  			}
>  
>  			hctx = blk_mq_map_queue_type(q, j, i);
> +			ctx->tags = 0;
> +			ctx->tag_offset = -1;
>  			ctx->hctxs[j] = hctx;
>  			/*
>  			 * If the CPU is already set in the mask, then we've
> @@ -3224,8 +3232,11 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>  	if (nr_hw_queues < 1 || nr_hw_queues == set->nr_hw_queues)
>  		return;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
> +	list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
> +		blk_mq_tag_queue_flush_batches(q);
>  		blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
> +	}
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Switch IO scheduler to 'none', cleaning up the data associated
>  	 * with the previous scheduler. We will switch back once we are done
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.h b/block/blk-mq.h
> index eaaca8fc1c28..7a3198f62f6e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.h
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ struct blk_mq_ctxs {
>  struct blk_mq_ctx {
>  	struct {
>  		spinlock_t		lock;
> +		unsigned int		tag_offset;
>  		struct list_head	rq_lists[HCTX_MAX_TYPES];
> +		unsigned long		tags;

blk_mq_get_tag_batch() can be called for getting both scheduler and driver
tag, but the above two seems shared for both, is that one issue?


thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-31  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-30 18:14 [PATCHSET 0/4] blk-mq: per-ctx tag caching Jens Axboe
2019-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] sbitmap: remove cleared bitmask Jens Axboe
2019-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] sbitmap: mask out top bits that can't be used Jens Axboe
2019-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] sbitmap: add batch tag retrieval Jens Axboe
2019-12-30 18:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] blk-mq: allocate tags in batches Jens Axboe
2019-12-31  2:18   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2019-12-31  3:53     ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-31  4:11       ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191231021834.GA20062@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.