All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Cc: Yufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	zhengchuan@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make sure last_lookup set as NULL after part deleted
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 16:17:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200103081745.GA11275@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ea362a86-d2de-7dfe-c826-d59e8b5068c3@huawei.com>

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 03:35:42PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2020/1/3 12:18, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:06:25AM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 2020/1/2 9:23, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 10:55:47PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> snip
> 
> >> We have got a seemingly better solution: caching the index of last_lookup in tbl->part[]
> >> instead of caching the pointer itself, so we can ensure the validity of returned pointer
> >> by ensuring it's not NULL in tbl->part[] as does when last_lookup is NULL or 0.
> > 
> > Thinking of the problem further, looks we don't need to hold ref for
> > .last_lookup.
> > 
> > What we need is to make sure the partition's ref is increased just
> > before assigning .last_lookup, so how about something like the following?
> > 
> The approach will work for the above case, but it will not work for the following case:
> 
> when blk_account_io_done() releases the last ref-counter of last_lookup and calls call_rcu(),
> and then a RCU read gets the to-be-freed hd-struct.
> 
> blk_account_io_done
>   rcu_read_lock()
>   // the last ref of last_lookup
>   hd_struct_put()
>     call_rcu
> 
>                               rcu_read_lock
>                               read last_lookup
> 
>     free()
>                               // use-after-free ?
>                               hd_struct_try_get

We may avoid that by clearing partition pointer after killing the
partition, how about the following change?

diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index 089e890ab208..79599f5fd5b7 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1365,18 +1365,6 @@ void blk_account_io_start(struct request *rq, bool new_io)
 		part_stat_inc(part, merges[rw]);
 	} else {
 		part = disk_map_sector_rcu(rq->rq_disk, blk_rq_pos(rq));
-		if (!hd_struct_try_get(part)) {
-			/*
-			 * The partition is already being removed,
-			 * the request will be accounted on the disk only
-			 *
-			 * We take a reference on disk->part0 although that
-			 * partition will never be deleted, so we can treat
-			 * it as any other partition.
-			 */
-			part = &rq->rq_disk->part0;
-			hd_struct_get(part);
-		}
 		part_inc_in_flight(rq->q, part, rw);
 		rq->part = part;
 	}
diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
index ff6268970ddc..e3dec90b1f43 100644
--- a/block/genhd.c
+++ b/block/genhd.c
@@ -286,17 +286,21 @@ struct hd_struct *disk_map_sector_rcu(struct gendisk *disk, sector_t sector)
 	ptbl = rcu_dereference(disk->part_tbl);
 
 	part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->last_lookup);
-	if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector))
+	if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector) && hd_struct_try_get(part))
 		return part;
 
 	for (i = 1; i < ptbl->len; i++) {
 		part = rcu_dereference(ptbl->part[i]);
 
 		if (part && sector_in_part(part, sector)) {
+                       if (!hd_struct_try_get(part))
+                               goto exit;
 			rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, part);
 			return part;
 		}
 	}
+ exit:
+	hd_struct_get(&disk->part0);
 	return &disk->part0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(disk_map_sector_rcu);
diff --git a/block/partition-generic.c b/block/partition-generic.c
index 1d20c9cf213f..9ef6c13d5650 100644
--- a/block/partition-generic.c
+++ b/block/partition-generic.c
@@ -283,8 +283,8 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
 	if (!part)
 		return;
 
-	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[partno], NULL);
-	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
+	get_device(disk_to_dev(disk));
+
 	kobject_put(part->holder_dir);
 	device_del(part_to_dev(part));
 
@@ -296,6 +296,15 @@ void delete_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
 	 */
 	blk_invalidate_devt(part_devt(part));
 	hd_struct_kill(part);
+
+	/*
+	 * clear partition pointers after this partition is killed, then
+	 * IO path can't re-assign ->last_lookup any more
+	 */
+	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[partno], NULL);
+	rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->last_lookup, NULL);
+
+	put_device(disk_to_dev(disk));
 }
 
 static ssize_t whole_disk_show(struct device *dev,

Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-03  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-31 11:09 [PATCH] block: make sure last_lookup set as NULL after part deleted Yufen Yu
2019-12-31 14:55 ` Hou Tao
2019-12-31 23:11   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-01-01  2:33     ` htbegin
2020-01-01  3:39       ` htbegin
2020-01-03 23:45     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-01-04  9:16       ` Hou Tao
2020-01-02  1:23   ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03  3:06     ` Hou Tao
2020-01-03  4:18       ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03  7:35         ` Hou Tao
2020-01-03  8:17           ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-01-03 12:03             ` Yufen Yu
2020-01-03 15:16               ` Ming Lei
2020-01-06  7:39                 ` Yufen Yu
2020-01-06  8:11                   ` Ming Lei
2020-01-06  9:41                     ` Hou Tao
2020-01-06 10:05                       ` Ming Lei
2020-01-07 11:40                         ` Hou Tao
2020-01-08  3:19                           ` Ming Lei
2020-01-03 12:43   ` Yufen Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200103081745.GA11275@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=houtao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=yuyufen@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengchuan@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.