From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: thp: grab the lock before manipulation defer list
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2020 07:39:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200103233925.GA3678@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2001031128200.160920@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:29:06AM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>On Fri, 3 Jan 2020, Wei Yang wrote:
>
>> As all the other places, we grab the lock before manipulate the defer list.
>> Current implementation may face a race condition.
>>
>> Fixes: 87eaceb3faa5 ("mm: thp: make deferred split shrinker memcg aware")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
>>
>> ---
>> I notice the difference during code reading and just confused about the
>> difference. No specific test is done since limited knowledge about cgroup.
>>
>> Maybe I miss something important?
>
>The check for !list_empty(page_deferred_list(page)) must certainly be
>serialized with doing list_del_init(page_deferred_list(page)).
>
Hi David
Would you mind giving more information? You mean list_empty and list_del_init
is atomic?
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-03 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-03 14:34 [RFC PATCH] mm: thp: grab the lock before manipulation defer list Wei Yang
2020-01-03 19:29 ` David Rientjes
2020-01-03 23:39 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2020-01-04 0:44 ` David Rientjes
2020-01-06 1:20 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-06 10:23 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-07 1:22 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-07 8:38 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-08 0:35 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-08 9:40 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-09 2:03 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-09 2:03 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-09 8:34 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-09 3:18 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-09 8:36 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-09 8:52 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-06 16:18 ` Alexander Duyck
2020-01-07 1:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-07 2:07 ` David Rientjes
2020-01-07 2:33 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200103233925.GA3678@richard \
--to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.