From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
Cc: qi.z.zhang@intel.com, beilei.xing@intel.com,
ciara.loftus@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/i40e: fix TSO pkt exceeds allowed buf size issue
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:52:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200107015215.GC49980@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191226064544.48322-1-xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
On 12/26, Xiaoyun Li wrote:
>Hardware limits that max buffer size per tx descriptor should be
>(16K-1)B. So when TSO enabled, the mbuf data size may exceed the
>limit and cause malicious behavior to the NIC. This patch fixes
>this issue by using more tx descs for this kind of large buffer.
>
>Fixes: 4861cde46116 ("i40e: new poll mode driver")
>Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
>Signed-off-by: Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
>---
>v3:
> * Reused the existing macros to define I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD
>v2:
> * Each pkt can have several segments so the needed tx descs should sum
> * all segments up.
>---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
>index 17dc8c78f..bbdba39b3 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c
>@@ -989,6 +989,24 @@ i40e_set_tso_ctx(struct rte_mbuf *mbuf, union i40e_tx_offload tx_offload)
> return ctx_desc;
> }
>
>+/* HW requires that Tx buffer size ranges from 1B up to (16K-1)B. */
>+#define I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD \
>+ (I40E_TXD_QW1_TX_BUF_SZ_MASK >> I40E_TXD_QW1_TX_BUF_SZ_SHIFT)
>+/* Calculate the number of TX descriptors needed for each pkt */
>+static inline uint16_t
>+i40e_calc_pkt_desc(struct rte_mbuf *tx_pkt)
>+{
>+ struct rte_mbuf *txd = tx_pkt;
>+ uint16_t count = 0;
>+
>+ while (txd != NULL) {
>+ count += DIV_ROUND_UP(txd->data_len, I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD);
>+ txd = txd->next;
>+ }
>+
>+ return count;
>+}
>+
> uint16_t
> i40e_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> {
>@@ -1046,8 +1064,15 @@ i40e_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> * The number of descriptors that must be allocated for
> * a packet equals to the number of the segments of that
> * packet plus 1 context descriptor if needed.
>+ * Recalculate the needed tx descs when TSO enabled in case
>+ * the mbuf data size exceeds max data size that hw allows
>+ * per tx desc.
> */
>- nb_used = (uint16_t)(tx_pkt->nb_segs + nb_ctx);
>+ if (ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG)
>+ nb_used = (uint16_t)(i40e_calc_pkt_desc(tx_pkt) +
>+ nb_ctx);
>+ else
>+ nb_used = (uint16_t)(tx_pkt->nb_segs + nb_ctx);
> tx_last = (uint16_t)(tx_id + nb_used - 1);
>
> /* Circular ring */
>@@ -1160,6 +1185,24 @@ i40e_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> slen = m_seg->data_len;
> buf_dma_addr = rte_mbuf_data_iova(m_seg);
>
>+ while ((ol_flags & PKT_TX_TCP_SEG) &&
>+ unlikely(slen > I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD)) {
>+ txd->buffer_addr =
>+ rte_cpu_to_le_64(buf_dma_addr);
>+ txd->cmd_type_offset_bsz =
>+ i40e_build_ctob(td_cmd,
>+ td_offset, I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD,
>+ td_tag);
>+
>+ buf_dma_addr += I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD;
>+ slen -= I40E_MAX_DATA_PER_TXD;
>+
>+ txe->last_id = tx_last;
>+ tx_id = txe->next_id;
>+ txe = txn;
>+ txd = &txr[tx_id];
>+ txn = &sw_ring[txe->next_id];
>+ }
> PMD_TX_LOG(DEBUG, "mbuf: %p, TDD[%u]:\n"
> "buf_dma_addr: %#"PRIx64";\n"
> "td_cmd: %#x;\n"
>--
>2.17.1
>
Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel, Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-07 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-23 2:55 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: fix TSO pkt exceeds allowed buf size issue Xiaoyun Li
2019-12-26 6:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Xiaoyun Li
2019-12-27 0:24 ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-01-02 11:23 ` Loftus, Ciara
2020-01-07 1:52 ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200107015215.GC49980@intel.com \
--to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.