From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-c.ads.isi.edu ([128.9.180.198]:14331 "EHLO mail-c.ads.isi.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726567AbgAMP2C (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:28:02 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:28:00 -0500 From: Ryan Goodfellow Subject: Re: zero-copy between interfaces Message-ID: <20200113152759.GD68570@smtp.ads.isi.edu> References: <14f9e1bf5c3a41dbaec53f83cb5f0564@isi.edu> <20200113124134.3974cbed@carbon> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200113124134.3974cbed@carbon> Sender: xdp-newbies-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Cc: "xdp-newbies@vger.kernel.org" On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:41:34PM +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 00:18:36 +0000 > Ryan Goodfellow wrote: >=20 > > The numbers that I have been able to achive with this code are the foll= owing. MTU > > is 1500 in all cases. > >=20 > > mlx5: pps ~ 2.4 Mpps, 29 Gbps (driver mode, zero-copy) > > i40e: pps ~ 700 Kpps, 8 Gbps (skb mode, copy) > > virtio: pps ~ 200 Kpps, 2.4 Gbps (skb mode, copy, all qemu/kvm VMs) > >=20 > > Are these numbers in the ballpark of what's expected? >=20 > I would say they are too slow / low. >=20 > Have you remembered to do bulking? >=20 I am using a batch size of 256. --=20 ~ ry