All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] of: add more dummy helper functions
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:55:18 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114235518.GA11575@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200108134936.3617013-1-arnd@arndb.de>

On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:49:28PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The new phy-j721e-wiz driver causes a link failure without CONFIG_OF:
> 
> drivers/phy/ti/phy-j721e-wiz.o: In function `wiz_remove':
> phy-j721e-wiz.c:(.text+0x40): undefined reference to `of_platform_device_destroy'
> 
> Add a dummy version of of_platform_device_destroy to avoid having to add
> Kconfig dependencies for the driver. As there are a few other functions
> without dummy implementations, add those as well for completeness.
> 
> Fixes: 42440de5438a ("phy: ti: j721e-wiz: Add support for WIZ module present in TI J721E SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/of_platform.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_platform.h b/include/linux/of_platform.h
> index 84a966623e78..f5dea3de4856 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_platform.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_platform.h
> @@ -48,28 +48,49 @@ struct of_dev_auxdata {
>  
>  extern const struct of_device_id of_default_bus_match_table[];
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>  /* Platform drivers register/unregister */
>  extern struct platform_device *of_device_alloc(struct device_node *np,
>  					 const char *bus_id,
>  					 struct device *parent);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>  extern struct platform_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np);
> -#else
> -static inline struct platform_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> -{
> -	return NULL;
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  /* Platform devices and busses creation */
>  extern struct platform_device *of_platform_device_create(struct device_node *np,
>  						   const char *bus_id,
>  						   struct device *parent);
> -
>  extern int of_platform_device_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data);
>  extern int of_platform_bus_probe(struct device_node *root,
>  				 const struct of_device_id *matches,
>  				 struct device *parent);
> +#else
> +static inline struct platform_device *of_device_alloc(struct device_node *np,
> +						      const char *bus_id,
> +						      struct device *parent)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline struct platform_device *of_find_device_by_node(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline struct platform_device *of_platform_device_create(struct device_node *np,
> +								const char *bus_id,
> +								struct device *parent)
> +{
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline int of_platform_device_destroy(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +static inline int of_platform_bus_probe(struct device_node *root,
> +					const struct of_device_id *matches,
> +					struct device *parent)
> +{
> +	return -ENODEV;
> +}

This and of_device_alloc are pretty much only powerpc functions, so I 
want things to break if there are new users. There's one user of 
of_device_alloc() and a couple for of_platform_bus_probe() which is 
deprecated in favor of of_platform_populate(). I think we can get rid of 
the remaining x86 callers.

(I have the same opinion on of_platform_device_create too, but I've 
given up on that).

Rob


      reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14 23:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-08 13:49 [PATCH] [v2] of: add more dummy helper functions Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-14 23:55 ` Rob Herring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200114235518.GA11575@bogus \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=jsarha@ti.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.