From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Zoltan Szubbocsev <zszubbocsev@micron.com>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Wojtaszczyk, Piotr" <WojtaszczykP@cumminsallison.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix proposal for the Micron shallow erase issue
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:13:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200115091325.667c06a8@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200115085806.218b6b32@collabora.com>
Hi Boris,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com> wrote on Wed, 15 Jan
2020 08:58:06 +0100:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 20:46:17 +0000
> "Wojtaszczyk, Piotr" <WojtaszczykP@cumminsallison.com> wrote:
>
> > On 1/14/20 3:12 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > Crap. I'll not resend immediately as this is an RFC, I expect
> > > feedback on this proposal before sending an actual patch.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Miquèl
> > >
> >
> > Hi Miquèl, here are some my comments:
> >
> > +static int micron_nand_avoid_shallow_erase(struct nand_chip *chip,
> > + unsigned int eb)
> > +{
> > + struct micron_nand *micron = nand_get_manufacturer_data(chip);
> > + unsigned int page = eb * nanddev_pages_per_eraseblock(&chip->base);
> > + u8 *databuf = nand_get_data_buf(chip);
> > + int ret, i;
> > +
> > + memset(databuf, 0xFF, nanddev_page_size(&chip->base));
> > +
> > + /* Micron advises to only write odd pages */
> > + for (i = 0; i < MICRON_SHALLOW_ERASE_MIN_PAGE; i += 2, page += 2) {
> > + if (!(micron->writtenp[eb] & BIT(i))) {
> > + ret = nand_write_page_raw(chip, databuf, false, page);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> >
> > Shouldn't we program only the OOB area of the pages to 0'es? Programming pages to 0xFF
> > which are already 0xFF takes more time and doesn't make any difference.
>
> Hm, I'm pretty sure we should set in-band data to 0, not 0xff.
> Programming only the OOB portion might not be enough for the internal
> "is page written?" logic to return true.
Absolutely, this is a mistake, the idea is to program all cells (to 0).
> > Also after power loss all flags in micron->writtenp are gone so the
> > micron_nand_avoid_shallow_erase will perform on all PEBs causing performance loss.
>
> Yes, that's a performance hit we'll have to accept for now.
>
This is quite severe issue, this is the best idea we came with to
limit performance hits.
Thanks,
Miquèl
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-31 19:26 [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix proposal for the Micron shallow erase issue Miquel Raynal
2019-12-31 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] mtd: rawnand: Add the nand_chip->erase hook Miquel Raynal
2019-12-31 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] mtd: rawnand: Add the nand_chip->write_oob hook Miquel Raynal
2019-12-31 19:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] mtd: rawnand: micron: Address the shallow erase issue Miquel Raynal
2020-01-02 18:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Fix proposal for the Micron " Florian Fainelli
2020-01-14 9:12 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-01-14 20:46 ` Wojtaszczyk, Piotr
2020-01-15 7:58 ` Boris Brezillon
2020-01-15 8:13 ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2020-01-15 16:51 ` Wojtaszczyk, Piotr
2020-05-03 11:29 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-04 8:08 ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-05-04 8:26 ` Miquel Raynal
2020-05-06 15:36 ` Bean Huo (beanhuo)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200115091325.667c06a8@xps13 \
--to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=WojtaszczykP@cumminsallison.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=zszubbocsev@micron.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.