All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
	"amir73il@gmail.com" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"miklos@szeredi.hu" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 02:20:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200118022032.GR8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200118011734.GD295250@vader>

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:17:34PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > No.  This is completely wrong; just make it ->link_replace() and be done
> > with that; no extra arguments and *always* the same conditions wrt
> > positive/negative.  One of the reasons why ->rename() tends to be
> > ugly (and a source of quite a few bugs over years) are those "if
> > target is positive/if target is negative" scattered over the instances.
> > 
> > Make the choice conditional upon the positivity of target.
> 
> Yup, you already convinced me that ->link_replace() is better in your
> last email.

FWIW, that might be not so simple ;-/  Reason: NFS-like stuff.  Client
sees a negative in cache; the problem is how to decide whether to
tell the server "OK, I want normal link()" vs. "if it turns out that
someone has created it by the time you see the request, give do
a replacing link".  Sure, if could treat ->link() telling you -EEXIST
as "OK, repeat it with ->link_replace(), then", but that's an extra
roundtrip...

Hell knows...  I would really like to avoid any kind of ->atomic_open()
redux ;-/

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-18  2:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-17 12:49 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination David Howells
2020-01-17 14:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 14:47   ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:56     ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 16:01       ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 15:46   ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 16:12     ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 16:48       ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 16:36     ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 16:59       ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 17:28         ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 18:17           ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 20:22             ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 22:22               ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 23:54                 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-18  0:47                   ` Al Viro
2020-01-18  1:17                     ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-18  2:20                       ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-01-21 23:05                         ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-22  6:57                           ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-22 22:10                             ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-23  3:47                               ` Al Viro
2020-01-23  7:16                                 ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:47                                   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-24 21:25                                     ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-31  5:24                                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-31  5:29                                         ` hch
2020-01-31  7:00                                         ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-31 20:33                                           ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-31 21:55                                             ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-28  1:27                                   ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-28 14:35                                   ` David Howells
2020-01-31  5:31                                     ` hch
2020-01-31  8:04                                       ` David Howells
2020-01-31  8:56                                         ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-22  9:53                         ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200118022032.GR8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.