From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jinyuqi@huawei.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, edumazet@google.com,
guoyang2@huawei.com, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: optimize cmpxchg in ip_idents_reserve
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:18:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120081858.GI14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45224c36-9941-aae5-aca4-e2c8e3723355@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:48:19AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 1/17/20 10:38 AM, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 10:16:45AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> Wasńt it the case back in 2016 already for linux-4.8 ?
> >>
> >> What will prevent someone to send another report to netdev/lkml ?
> >>
> >> -fno-strict-overflow support is not a prereq for CONFIG_UBSAN.
> >>
> >> Fact that we kept in lib/ubsan.c and lib/test_ubsan.c code for
> >> test_ubsan_add_overflow() and test_ubsan_sub_overflow() is disturbing.
> >>
> >
> > No, it was bumped in 2018 in commit cafa0010cd51 ("Raise the minimum
> > required gcc version to 4.6"). That raised it from 3.2 -> 4.6.
> >
>
> This seems good to me, for gcc at least.
>
> Maybe it is time to enfore -fno-strict-overflow in KBUILD_CFLAGS
> instead of making it conditional.
IIRC there was a bug in UBSAN vs -fwrapv/-fno-strict-overflow that was
only fixed in gcc-8 or 9 or so.
So while the -fwrapv/-fno-strict-overflow flag has been correctly
supported since like forever, UBSAN was buggy until quite recent when
used in conjustion with that flag.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-20 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-15 3:23 [PATCH] net: optimize cmpxchg in ip_idents_reserve Shaokun Zhang
2020-01-16 12:27 ` David Miller
2020-01-16 14:05 ` Shaokun Zhang
2020-01-16 15:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-16 15:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-17 6:54 ` Shaokun Zhang
2020-01-17 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-17 16:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-17 18:03 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-01-17 18:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-17 18:38 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-01-17 18:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-20 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-05-07 9:12 ` Shaokun Zhang
2020-05-07 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-19 3:46 ` Shaokun Zhang
2020-01-19 4:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-01-21 2:40 ` Shaokun Zhang
2020-01-22 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200120081858.GI14879@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=guoyang2@huawei.com \
--cc=jinyuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.