All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	jacob.jun.pan@intel.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] PCI: Add "pci=iommu_passthrough=" parameter for iommu passthrough
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:17:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121141712.GA94911@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200101052648.14295-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

[+cc linux-pci, thread at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200101052648.14295-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com]

On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 01:26:46PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The new parameter takes a list of devices separated by a semicolon.
> Each device specified will have its iommu_passthrough bit in struct
> device set. This is very similar to the existing 'disable_acs_redir'
> parameter.

Almost all of this patchset is in drivers/iommu.  Should the parameter
be "iommu ..." instead of "pci=iommu_passthrough=..."?

There is already an "iommu.passthrough=" argument.  Would this fit
better there?  Since the iommu_passthrough bit is generic, it seems
like you anticipate similar situations for non-PCI devices.

> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 +++
>  drivers/pci/pci.c                             | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pci/pci.h                             |  1 +
>  drivers/pci/probe.c                           |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index ade4e6ec23e0..d3edc2cb6696 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3583,6 +3583,11 @@
>  				may put more devices in an IOMMU group.
>  		force_floating	[S390] Force usage of floating interrupts.
>  		nomio		[S390] Do not use MIO instructions.
> +		iommu_passthrough=<pci_dev>[; ...]
> +				Specify one or more PCI devices (in the format
> +				specified above) separated by semicolons.
> +				Each device specified will bypass IOMMU DMA
> +				translation.
>  
>  	pcie_aspm=	[PCIE] Forcibly enable or disable PCIe Active State Power
>  			Management.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 90dbd7c70371..05bf3f4acc36 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -6401,6 +6401,37 @@ void __weak pci_fixup_cardbus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_fixup_cardbus);
>  
> +static const char *iommu_passthrough_param;
> +bool pci_iommu_passthrough_match(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	const char *p = iommu_passthrough_param;
> +
> +	if (!p)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	while (*p) {
> +		ret = pci_dev_str_match(dev, p, &p);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			pr_info_once("PCI: Can't parse iommu_passthrough parameter: %s\n",
> +				     iommu_passthrough_param);
> +
> +			break;
> +		} else if (ret == 1) {
> +			pci_info(dev, "PCI: IOMMU passthrough\n");
> +			return true;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (*p != ';' && *p != ',') {
> +			/* End of param or invalid format */
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		p++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init pci_setup(char *str)
>  {
>  	while (str) {
> @@ -6462,6 +6493,8 @@ static int __init pci_setup(char *str)
>  				pci_add_flags(PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS);
>  			} else if (!strncmp(str, "disable_acs_redir=", 18)) {
>  				disable_acs_redir_param = str + 18;
> +			} else if (!strncmp(str, "iommu_passthrough=", 18)) {
> +				iommu_passthrough_param = str + 18;
>  			} else {
>  				pr_err("PCI: Unknown option `%s'\n", str);
>  			}
> @@ -6486,6 +6519,7 @@ static int __init pci_realloc_setup_params(void)
>  	resource_alignment_param = kstrdup(resource_alignment_param,
>  					   GFP_KERNEL);
>  	disable_acs_redir_param = kstrdup(disable_acs_redir_param, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	iommu_passthrough_param = kstrdup(iommu_passthrough_param, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index a0a53bd05a0b..95f6af06aba6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ void pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void pci_disable_bridge_window(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  struct pci_bus *pci_bus_get(struct pci_bus *bus);
>  void pci_bus_put(struct pci_bus *bus);
> +bool pci_iommu_passthrough_match(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  
>  /* PCIe link information */
>  #define PCIE_SPEED2STR(speed) \
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 512cb4312ddd..4c571ee75621 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2404,6 +2404,8 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
>  
>  	dev->state_saved = false;
>  
> +	dev->dev.iommu_passthrough = pci_iommu_passthrough_match(dev);
> +
>  	pci_init_capabilities(dev);
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] PCI: Add "pci=iommu_passthrough=" parameter for iommu passthrough
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 08:17:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200121141712.GA94911@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200101052648.14295-3-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>

[+cc linux-pci, thread at https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200101052648.14295-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com]

On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 01:26:46PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> The new parameter takes a list of devices separated by a semicolon.
> Each device specified will have its iommu_passthrough bit in struct
> device set. This is very similar to the existing 'disable_acs_redir'
> parameter.

Almost all of this patchset is in drivers/iommu.  Should the parameter
be "iommu ..." instead of "pci=iommu_passthrough=..."?

There is already an "iommu.passthrough=" argument.  Would this fit
better there?  Since the iommu_passthrough bit is generic, it seems
like you anticipate similar situations for non-PCI devices.

> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  5 +++
>  drivers/pci/pci.c                             | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/pci/pci.h                             |  1 +
>  drivers/pci/probe.c                           |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index ade4e6ec23e0..d3edc2cb6696 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -3583,6 +3583,11 @@
>  				may put more devices in an IOMMU group.
>  		force_floating	[S390] Force usage of floating interrupts.
>  		nomio		[S390] Do not use MIO instructions.
> +		iommu_passthrough=<pci_dev>[; ...]
> +				Specify one or more PCI devices (in the format
> +				specified above) separated by semicolons.
> +				Each device specified will bypass IOMMU DMA
> +				translation.
>  
>  	pcie_aspm=	[PCIE] Forcibly enable or disable PCIe Active State Power
>  			Management.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 90dbd7c70371..05bf3f4acc36 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -6401,6 +6401,37 @@ void __weak pci_fixup_cardbus(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_fixup_cardbus);
>  
> +static const char *iommu_passthrough_param;
> +bool pci_iommu_passthrough_match(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	const char *p = iommu_passthrough_param;
> +
> +	if (!p)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	while (*p) {
> +		ret = pci_dev_str_match(dev, p, &p);
> +		if (ret < 0) {
> +			pr_info_once("PCI: Can't parse iommu_passthrough parameter: %s\n",
> +				     iommu_passthrough_param);
> +
> +			break;
> +		} else if (ret == 1) {
> +			pci_info(dev, "PCI: IOMMU passthrough\n");
> +			return true;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (*p != ';' && *p != ',') {
> +			/* End of param or invalid format */
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		p++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int __init pci_setup(char *str)
>  {
>  	while (str) {
> @@ -6462,6 +6493,8 @@ static int __init pci_setup(char *str)
>  				pci_add_flags(PCI_SCAN_ALL_PCIE_DEVS);
>  			} else if (!strncmp(str, "disable_acs_redir=", 18)) {
>  				disable_acs_redir_param = str + 18;
> +			} else if (!strncmp(str, "iommu_passthrough=", 18)) {
> +				iommu_passthrough_param = str + 18;
>  			} else {
>  				pr_err("PCI: Unknown option `%s'\n", str);
>  			}
> @@ -6486,6 +6519,7 @@ static int __init pci_realloc_setup_params(void)
>  	resource_alignment_param = kstrdup(resource_alignment_param,
>  					   GFP_KERNEL);
>  	disable_acs_redir_param = kstrdup(disable_acs_redir_param, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	iommu_passthrough_param = kstrdup(iommu_passthrough_param, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> index a0a53bd05a0b..95f6af06aba6 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
> @@ -288,6 +288,7 @@ void pci_reassigndev_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  void pci_disable_bridge_window(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  struct pci_bus *pci_bus_get(struct pci_bus *bus);
>  void pci_bus_put(struct pci_bus *bus);
> +bool pci_iommu_passthrough_match(struct pci_dev *dev);
>  
>  /* PCIe link information */
>  #define PCIE_SPEED2STR(speed) \
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> index 512cb4312ddd..4c571ee75621 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
> @@ -2404,6 +2404,8 @@ void pci_device_add(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_bus *bus)
>  
>  	dev->state_saved = false;
>  
> +	dev->dev.iommu_passthrough = pci_iommu_passthrough_match(dev);
> +
>  	pci_init_capabilities(dev);
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-21 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-01  5:26 [RFC PATCH 0/4] iommu: Per-group default domain type Lu Baolu
2020-01-01  5:26 ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-01  5:26 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] driver core: Add iommu_passthrough to struct device Lu Baolu
2020-01-01  5:26   ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-01  5:26 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] PCI: Add "pci=iommu_passthrough=" parameter for iommu passthrough Lu Baolu
2020-01-01  5:26   ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-18  0:18   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-01-18  0:18     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-01-18  2:04     ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-18  2:04       ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-21 14:17   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-01-21 14:17     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-01-22  4:49     ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-22  4:49       ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-01  5:26 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] iommu: Preallocate iommu group when probing devices Lu Baolu
2020-01-01  5:26   ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-17 10:21   ` Joerg Roedel
2020-01-17 10:21     ` Joerg Roedel
2020-01-18  2:18     ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-18  2:18       ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-19  6:29     ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-19  6:29       ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-21 12:45       ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-21 12:45         ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-22  5:39         ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-22  5:39           ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-23 14:55           ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-23 14:55             ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-01  5:26 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] iommu: Determine default domain type before allocating domain Lu Baolu
2020-01-01  5:26   ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-20  9:44 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] iommu: Per-group default domain type John Garry
2020-01-20  9:44   ` John Garry
2020-01-21  0:43   ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-21  0:43     ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-21 10:14     ` John Garry
2020-01-21 10:14       ` John Garry
2020-01-22  4:58       ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-22  4:58         ` Lu Baolu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200121141712.GA94911@google.com \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.