From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Sunil Kovvuri <sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
Geetha sowjanya <gakula@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/17] octeontx2-pf: Add packet transmission support
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 06:24:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200123062425.41e6d8ae@cakuba> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+sq2CdX31cqsSc=qRhbcZ5fOk2zGOrhTMGqhsPddbhW=YQPCQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 01:20:51 +0530, Sunil Kovvuri wrote:
> > Why do you care about big endian bitfields tho, if you don't care about
> > endianness of the data itself?
>
> At this point of time we are not addressing big endian functionality,
> so few things
> might be broken in that aspect. If it's preferred to remove, i will remove it.
Yes, I think removing it would be cleaner than having it partially
working. The driver depends on ARM64, anyway.
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > #endif /* OTX2_STRUCT_H */
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> > > index e6be18d..f416603 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/nic/otx2_txrx.c
> > > @@ -32,6 +32,78 @@ static struct nix_cqe_hdr_s *otx2_get_next_cqe(struct otx2_cq_queue *cq)
> > > return cqe_hdr;
> > > }
> > >
> >> > +static void otx2_sqe_flush(struct otx2_snd_queue *sq, int size)
> > > +{
> > > + u64 status;
> > > +
> > > + /* Packet data stores should finish before SQE is flushed to HW */
> >
> > Packet data is synced by the dma operations the barrier shouldn't be
> > needed AFAIK (and if it would be, dma_wmb() would not be the one, as it
> > only works for iomem AFAIU).
> >
> > > + dma_wmb();
>
> Due to out of order execution by CPU, HW folks have suggested add a barrier
> to avoid scenarios where packet is transmitted before all stores from
> CPU are committed.
> On arm64 a dmb() is less costlier than a dsb() barrier and as per HW
> folks a dmb(st)
> is sufficient to ensure all stores from CPU are committed. And
> dma_wmb() uses dmb(st)
> hence it is used. It's more of choice of architecture specific
> instruction rather than the API.
Hmm.. I'm not a DMA API expert but AFAIU it'd be a serious bug if
dma_map..() APIs didn't guarantee that packet data is written out.
Not only out of the CPU store buffer but also the caches to DRAM.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-23 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 13:21 [PATCH v4 00/17] octeontx2-pf: Add network driver for physical function sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/17] octeontx2-pf: Add Marvell OcteonTX2 NIC driver sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 16:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 02/17] octeontx2-pf: Mailbox communication with AF sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 16:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-22 19:27 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2020-01-23 14:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-24 8:33 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-01-24 17:15 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 03/17] octeontx2-pf: Attach NIX and NPA block LFs sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 16:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-22 19:27 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 04/17] octeontx2-pf: Initialize and config queues sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 16:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-22 19:29 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2020-01-23 14:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-24 11:21 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 05/17] octeontx2-pf: Setup interrupts and NAPI handler sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 06/17] octeontx2-pf: Receive packet handling support sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 16:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-22 19:34 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2020-01-24 10:14 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 07/17] octeontx2-pf: Add packet transmission support sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 16:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-01-22 19:50 ` Sunil Kovvuri
2020-01-23 14:24 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 08/17] octeontx2-pf: Register and handle link notifications sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 09/17] octeontx2-pf: MTU, MAC and RX mode config support sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 10/17] octeontx2-pf: Error handling support sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 11/17] octeontx2-pf: Receive side scaling support sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 12/17] octeontx2-pf: TCP segmentation offload support sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 13/17] octeontx2-pf: Add ndo_get_stats64 sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 14/17] octeontx2-pf: Add basic ethtool support sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 15/17] octeontx2-pf: ethtool RSS config support sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 16/17] Documentation: net: octeontx2: Add RVU HW and drivers overview sunil.kovvuri
2020-01-21 13:21 ` [PATCH v4 17/17] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Marvell OcteonTX2 Physical Function driver sunil.kovvuri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200123062425.41e6d8ae@cakuba \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gakula@marvell.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.