All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: fix race between adding and putting tree mod seq elements and nodes
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:02:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200123140256.6D28720684@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122122320.30073-1-fdmanana@kernel.org>

Hi,

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: bd989ba359f2 ("Btrfs: add tree modification log functions").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.4.13, v4.19.97, v4.14.166, v4.9.210, v4.4.210.

v5.4.13: Build OK!
v4.19.97: Build OK!
v4.14.166: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    3ac6de1abd7a ("btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_set_node_key")
    6074d45f6076 ("btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_insert_move")
    b1a09f1ec540 ("btrfs: remove trivial locking wrappers of tree mod log")
    db7279a20b09 ("btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_free_eb")
    e09c2efe7eba ("btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_insert_key")

v4.9.210: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    0b246afa62b0 ("btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, add fs_info convenience variables")
    3ac6de1abd7a ("btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_set_node_key")
    62d1f9fe97dd ("btrfs: remove trivial helper btrfs_find_tree_block")
    b1a09f1ec540 ("btrfs: remove trivial locking wrappers of tree mod log")
    cf8cddd38bab ("btrfs: don't abuse REQ_OP_* flags for btrfs_map_block")
    da17066c4047 ("btrfs: pull node/sector/stripe sizes out of root and into fs_info")
    de143792253e ("btrfs: struct btrfsic_state->root should be an fs_info")
    e09c2efe7eba ("btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_insert_key")
    fb456252d3d9 ("btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, use fs_info->dev_root everywhere")

v4.4.210: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    0132761017e0 ("btrfs: fix string and comment grammatical issues and typos")
    09cbfeaf1a5a ("mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros")
    0b246afa62b0 ("btrfs: root->fs_info cleanup, add fs_info convenience variables")
    0e749e54244e ("dax: increase granularity of dax_clear_blocks() operations")
    3ac6de1abd7a ("btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_set_node_key")
    4420cfd3f51c ("staging: lustre: format properly all comment blocks for LNet core")
    52db400fcd50 ("pmem, dax: clean up clear_pmem()")
    5fd88337d209 ("staging: lustre: fix all conditional comparison to zero in LNet layer")
    b1a09f1ec540 ("btrfs: remove trivial locking wrappers of tree mod log")
    b2e0d1625e19 ("dax: fix lifetime of in-kernel dax mappings with dax_map_atomic()")
    bb7ab3b92e46 ("btrfs: Fix misspellings in comments.")
    cf8cddd38bab ("btrfs: don't abuse REQ_OP_* flags for btrfs_map_block")
    d1a5f2b4d8a1 ("block: use DAX for partition table reads")
    de143792253e ("btrfs: struct btrfsic_state->root should be an fs_info")
    e09c2efe7eba ("btrfs: drop fs_info parameter from tree_mod_log_insert_key")
    e10624f8c097 ("pmem: fail io-requests to known bad blocks")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-23 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22 12:23 [PATCH 1/2] Btrfs: fix race between adding and putting tree mod seq elements and nodes fdmanana
2020-01-22 20:29 ` Josef Bacik
2020-01-23 14:02 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-01-28 10:50 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-01-28 16:10 ` David Sterba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200123140256.6D28720684@mail.kernel.org \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.