From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Gerhold Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 18:56:10 +0100 Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/5] arm: Restore minimal support for ST-Ericsson U8500 SoC In-Reply-To: <20200122180350.GK26536@bill-the-cat> References: <20200104174519.19238-1-stephan@gerhold.net> <20200122164707.GA883@gerhold.net> <20200122180350.GK26536@bill-the-cat> Message-ID: <20200123175610.GA922@gerhold.net> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 01:03:50PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 05:47:07PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 06:45:14PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote: > > > This patch series restores minimal U-Boot support for > > > the ST-Ericsson NovaThor U8500 SoC. > > > > > > Previous support for U8500 was removed in > > > commit 68282f55b846 ("arm: Remove unused ST-Ericsson u8500 arch") > > > since none of the boards were converted to generic boards > > > before the deadline. > > > > > > The motivation for adding the SoC and board is explained in > > > - Patch 3 ("arm: Add support for ST-Ericsson U8500 SoC") and > > > - Patch 5 ("board: Add new Samsung "stemmy" board based on ST-Ericsson U8500") > > > > > > I have additional patches for MMC, USB, display and the "stemmy" > > > board, that configure it to provide an Android fastboot interface > > > with similar functionality as the original Samsung bootloader. > > > Some of the patches require some additional work, so I thought > > > it is easier to start with some minimal changes first (only UART). > > > > > > I think this makes the patch series quite straightforward, > > > with only ~225 new lines of C code, plus device tree and documentation. > > > The only patch that stands out with ~1.8k lines is the device tree > > > import, directly copied (without modification) from the Linux kernel. > > > > > > > Since we are approaching the end of the merge window, > > I was wondering if there is anything I can do to get this patch set > > applied for v2020.04? > > Since you had marked it as RFC, I had marked it as such in patchwork and > overlooked it. I'll take a look soon, thanks. Thank you! I thought marking it as RFC is appropriate since I'm adding a new SoC and this is my first U-Boot patch. But it is working fine, so unless there are comments it should be good to go :) Thanks, Stephan