From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com,
jhubbard@nvidia.com, vbabka@suse.cz, cl@linux.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] mm/migrate.c: also overwrite error when it is bigger than zero
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 22:15:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200124141538.GA12509@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200124072127.GO29276@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 08:21:27AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
>[Sorry I have missed this patch previously]
>
No problem, thanks for your comment.
>On Sun 19-01-20 14:57:53, Wei Yang wrote:
>> If we get here after successfully adding page to list, err would be
>> 1 to indicate the page is queued in the list.
>>
>> Current code has two problems:
>>
>> * on success, 0 is not returned
>> * on error, if add_page_for_migratioin() return 1, and the following err1
>> from do_move_pages_to_node() is set, the err1 is not returned since err
>> is 1
>
>This made my really scratch my head to grasp. So essentially err > 0
>will happen when we reach the end of the loop and rely on the
>out_flush flushing to migrate the batch. Then err contains the
>add_page_for_migratioin return value. And that would leak to the
>userspace.
>
>What would you say about the following wording instead?
>"
>out_flush part of do_pages_move is responsible for migrating the last
>batch that accumulated while processing the input in the loop.
>do_move_pages_to_node return value is supposed to override any
>preexisting error (e.g. when the user input is garbage) but the current
I am afraid I have a different understanding here.
If we jump to out_flush on the test of node_isset(), err is -EACCESS. Current
logic would return this instead of the error from do_move_pages_to_node().
Seems we don't override -EACCESS.
Is my understanding correct?
>logic is wrong because add_page_for_migration returns 1 when
>successfully adding a page into the batch and therefore this will be the
>last err value after the loop is processed without any actual error.
>We want to override that value of course because do_pages_move would
>return 1 to the userspace even without any errors.
>"
>
>> And these behaviors break the user interface.
>>
>> Fixes: e0153fc2c760 ("mm: move_pages: return valid node id in status if the
>> page is already on the target node").
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
>
>Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>
>>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> * put more words to explain the error case
>> ---
>> mm/migrate.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> index 86873b6f38a7..430fdccc733e 100644
>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> @@ -1676,7 +1676,7 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
>> err1 = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node);
>> if (!err1)
>> err1 = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start);
>> - if (!err)
>> + if (err >= 0)
>> err = err1;
>> out:
>> return err;
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
>--
>Michal Hocko
>SUSE Labs
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-24 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-19 6:57 [Patch v2] mm/migrate.c: also overwrite error when it is bigger than zero Wei Yang
2020-01-21 1:53 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-21 2:34 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-21 19:33 ` John Hubbard
2020-01-22 0:42 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-22 1:29 ` John Hubbard
2020-01-21 19:30 ` Yang Shi
2020-01-22 0:41 ` Wei Yang
2020-01-24 7:21 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-24 14:15 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2020-01-24 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-24 15:28 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200124141538.GA12509@richard \
--to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.