From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, lenb@kernel.org, jeremy.linton@arm.com,
arnd@arndb.de, olof@lixom.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, guohanjun@huawei.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] ACPI/PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_get_package_info() API
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:41:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200130174116.GA57159@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bfa7770b-d323-1f2a-98c8-44c2142c9124@huawei.com>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 04:12:20PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 30/01/2020 11:23, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > I personally would not prefer to add the support when I know it is getting
> > > deprecated. I am not sure on kernel community policy on the same.
> > >
> > OK, the details on the proposal to deprecate can be now found in UEFI
> > bugzilla [1]
> >
>
> Wouldn't it be a better approach to propose deprecating the field when there
> is a readily available alternative, i.e. not a spec from a different body in
> beta stage?
>
Understandable and valid concerns. It would be helpful if you raise it in
the UEFI bugzilla. Your concerns will get lost if you just raise here.
> To me, this new SMC support will take an appreciable amount of time to be
> implemented in FW by SiPs when actually released. And if it requires an ATF
> upgrade - which I guess it does - then that's a big job.
>
Again I do understand, please raise it with the SMCCC specification contact
as listed in the link I shared.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-30 17:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-28 11:14 [PATCH RFC 0/2] Add basic generic ACPI soc driver John Garry
2020-01-28 11:14 ` [PATCH RFC 1/2] ACPI/PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_get_package_info() API John Garry
2020-01-28 12:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-28 14:04 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 14:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-29 11:03 ` John Garry
2020-01-30 11:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-30 16:12 ` John Garry
2020-01-30 17:41 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-01-31 10:58 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 11:14 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] soc: Add a basic ACPI generic driver John Garry
2020-01-28 11:56 ` Greg KH
2020-01-28 13:33 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 12:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-01-28 14:46 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 15:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-28 15:59 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 16:17 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-28 17:51 ` Olof Johansson
2020-01-28 18:22 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-01-28 19:28 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 22:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-01-29 10:27 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 20:06 ` Olof Johansson
2020-01-29 9:58 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 16:56 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] Add basic generic ACPI soc driver Jeremy Linton
2020-01-28 17:28 ` John Garry
2020-01-28 19:04 ` Jeremy Linton
2020-01-28 20:07 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200130174116.GA57159@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.