All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, jrg.otte@gmail.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi/x86: fix boot regression on systems with invalid memmap entries
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2020 10:34:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200202093442.GB72728@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200201233304.18322-1-ardb@kernel.org>


* Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> wrote:

> In efi_clean_memmap(), we do a pass over the EFI memory map to remove
> bogus entries that may be returned on certain systems.
> 
> Commit 1db91035d01aa8bf ("efi: Add tracking for dynamically allocated
> memmaps") refactored this code to pass the input to efi_memmap_install()
> via a temporary struct on the stack, which is populated using an
> initializer which inadvertently defines the value of its size field
> in terms of its desc_size field, which value cannot be relied upon yet
> in the initializer itself.
> 
> Fix this by using efi.memmap.desc_size instead, which is where we get
> the value for desc_size from in the first place.
> 
> Tested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> index 59f7f6d60cf6..ae923ee8e2b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void __init efi_clean_memmap(void)
>  			.phys_map = efi.memmap.phys_map,
>  			.desc_version = efi.memmap.desc_version,
>  			.desc_size = efi.memmap.desc_size,
> -			.size = data.desc_size * (efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal),
> +			.size = efi.memmap.desc_size * (efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal),
>  			.flags = 0,
>  		};

Applied, and I also added:

    Reported-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
    Tested-by: Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>

I presumptively added the Jörg's Tested-by tag: won't send the commit to 
Linus if he still has trouble booting the laptop.

I'm still amazed GCC doesn't warn about this pattern - why?

BTW., could we please also organize such assignments vertically as well:

			.phys_map	= efi.memmap.phys_map,
			.desc_version	= efi.memmap.desc_version,
			.desc_size	= efi.memmap.desc_size,
			.size		= efi.memmap.desc_size * (efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal),
			.flags		= 0,

(See the patch below.)

Had we done that earlier the weird pattern would have stuck out a lot 
more:

			.phys_map	= efi.memmap.phys_map,
			.desc_version	= efi.memmap.desc_version,
			.desc_size	= efi.memmap.desc_size,
			.size		= data.desc_size * (efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal),
			.flags		= 0,

BTW., is there a reason "struct efi_memory_map" doesn't embedd a "struct 
efi_memory_map_data"? Or is efi_memory_map firmware ABI?

If they shared the structure then copying would be easier.

Thanks,

	Ingo

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

 arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
index ae923ee8e2b4..293c47f9cb39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi.c
@@ -305,11 +305,11 @@ static void __init efi_clean_memmap(void)
 
 	if (n_removal > 0) {
 		struct efi_memory_map_data data = {
-			.phys_map = efi.memmap.phys_map,
-			.desc_version = efi.memmap.desc_version,
-			.desc_size = efi.memmap.desc_size,
-			.size = efi.memmap.desc_size * (efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal),
-			.flags = 0,
+			.phys_map	= efi.memmap.phys_map,
+			.desc_version	= efi.memmap.desc_version,
+			.desc_size	= efi.memmap.desc_size,
+			.size		= efi.memmap.desc_size * (efi.memmap.nr_map - n_removal),
+			.flags		= 0,
 		};
 
 		pr_warn("Removing %d invalid memory map entries.\n", n_removal);

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-02  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-01 23:33 [PATCH] efi/x86: fix boot regression on systems with invalid memmap entries Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-02  9:34 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2020-02-02  9:50   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-02-02  9:39 ` [tip: efi/urgent] efi/x86: Fix " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200202093442.GB72728@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jrg.otte@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.