From: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@gmail.com>
Cc: tyreld@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/eeh: Remove PHB check in probe
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 16:30:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200206053057.GG15629@osmium> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200203083521.16549-5-oohall@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1579 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:35:19PM +1100, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This check for a missing PHB has existing in various forms since the
> initial PPC64 port was upstreamed in 2002. The idea seems to be that we
> need to guard against creating pci-specific data structures for the non-pci
> children of a PCI device tree node (e.g. USB devices). However, we only
> create pci_dn structures for DT nodes that correspond to PCI devices so
> there's not much point in doing this check in the eeh_probe path.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>
I always wondered how to test that block... and it's just dead code.
Reviewed-by: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> index 9cb3370..a9e4ca7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh.c
> @@ -1120,7 +1120,6 @@ core_initcall_sync(eeh_init);
> */
> void eeh_add_device_early(struct pci_dn *pdn)
> {
> - struct pci_controller *phb = pdn ? pdn->phb : NULL;
> struct eeh_dev *edev = pdn_to_eeh_dev(pdn);
>
> if (!edev)
> @@ -1129,11 +1128,6 @@ void eeh_add_device_early(struct pci_dn *pdn)
> if (!eeh_has_flag(EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE))
> return;
>
> - /* USB Bus children of PCI devices will not have BUID's */
> - if (NULL == phb ||
> - (eeh_has_flag(EEH_PROBE_MODE_DEVTREE) && 0 == phb->buid))
> - return;
> -
> eeh_ops->probe(pdn, NULL);
> }
>
> --
> 2.9.5
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-06 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-03 8:35 EEH init cleanup Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc/eeh: Add sysfs files in late probe Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-06 4:13 ` Sam Bobroff
2020-02-07 3:22 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh_add_device_tree_late() Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-06 4:23 ` Sam Bobroff
2020-02-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc/eeh: Do early EEH init only when required Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-06 5:22 ` Sam Bobroff
2020-02-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc/eeh: Remove PHB check in probe Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-06 5:30 ` Sam Bobroff [this message]
2020-02-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/eeh: Make early EEH init pseries specific Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-07 2:24 ` Sam Bobroff
2020-02-07 3:35 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-07 3:56 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-03 8:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc/eeh: Rework eeh_ops->probe() Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-07 2:37 ` Sam Bobroff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200206053057.GG15629@osmium \
--to=sbobroff@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.