From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@gmail.com>, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] dissect: change do_symbol(SYM_FN) to check base_type->stmt != NULL
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 11:32:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207103207.GA16991@redhat.com> (raw)
examine_fn_arguments() silently degenerates function arguments into
pointers but dissect doesn't do evaluate_symbol_list(), that is why
do_sym_list(type->arguments) can report the bogus definitions.
Test case:
void extf(int MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED);
typedef void (fptr_t)(int MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED);
void func1(fptr_t fptr) {}
void func2(typeof(extf) fptr) {}
void func3(void) { typeof(extf) fptr; };
void func4(void (fptr)(int MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED)) {}
without this patch:
4:6 def func1 void ( ... )
4:12 func1 def fptr void ( ... )
2:23 fptr def MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED int
5:6 def func2 void ( ... )
5:19 func2 --- extf void ( ... )
5:12 func2 def fptr void ( ... )
1:11 fptr def MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED int
6:6 def func3 void ( ... )
6:27 func3 --- extf void ( ... )
6:33 func3 def fptr void ( ... )
1:11 fptr def MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED int
7:6 def func4 void ( ... )
7:12 func4 def fptr void ( ... )
7:24 fptr def MUST_NOT_BE_REPORTED int
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
dissect.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dissect.c b/dissect.c
index 54e11d2..b48cd85 100644
--- a/dissect.c
+++ b/dissect.c
@@ -589,6 +589,7 @@ static inline struct symbol *do_symbol(struct symbol *sym)
{
struct symbol *type = base_type(sym);
struct symbol *dctx = dissect_ctx;
+ struct statement *stmt;
reporter->r_symdef(sym);
@@ -603,12 +604,22 @@ static inline struct symbol *do_symbol(struct symbol *sym)
dissect_ctx = dctx;
break; case SYM_FN:
+ stmt = sym->ctype.modifiers & MOD_INLINE
+ ? type->inline_stmt
+ : type->stmt;
+ if (!stmt)
+ break;
+
+ if (dctx)
+ sparse_error(dctx->pos,
+ "dissect_ctx change %.*s -> %s",
+ dctx->ident->len, dctx->ident->name,
+ show_ident(sym->ident));
+
dissect_ctx = sym;
return_type = base_type(type);
do_sym_list(type->arguments);
- do_statement(U_VOID, sym->ctype.modifiers & MOD_INLINE
- ? type->inline_stmt
- : type->stmt);
+ do_statement(U_VOID, stmt);
dissect_ctx = dctx;
return_type = NULL;
}
--
2.5.0
reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200207103207.GA16991@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=gladkov.alexey@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.