From: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] mm/sparse.c: Introduce a new function clear_subsection_map()
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 14:02:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200210060253.GE7326@richard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200210033627.GZ8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:36:27AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>On 02/10/20 at 07:07am, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 06:48:21PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> >Wrap the codes clearing subsection map of one memory region in
>> >section_deactivate() into clear_subsection_map().
>> >
>>
>> Patch 1 and 2 server the same purpose -- to #ifdef the VMEMMAP.
>
>Hmm, I didn't say patch 1 and 2 are preparation works because they had
>better be done even if we don't take off subsection map from
>SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case. Wrapping the subsection map filling and clearing
>codes into separate new functions, can make section_activate() and
>section_deactivate() much clearer on code logic.
>
>If you don't mind, I will keep them for now, and see what other people
>will say.
No objection.
>
>Thanks
>Baoquan
>
>>
>> >---
>> > mm/sparse.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> > 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>> >index 9ad741ccbeb6..696f6b9f706e 100644
>> >--- a/mm/sparse.c
>> >+++ b/mm/sparse.c
>> >@@ -726,14 +726,25 @@ static void free_map_bootmem(struct page *memmap)
>> > }
>> > #endif /* CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP */
>> >
>> >-static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> >- struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>> >+/**
>> >+ * clear_subsection_map - Clear subsection map of one memory region
>> >+ *
>> >+ * @pfn - start pfn of the memory range
>> >+ * @nr_pages - number of pfns to add in the region
>> >+ *
>> >+ * This is only intended for hotplug, and clear the related subsection
>> >+ * map inside one section.
>> >+ *
>> >+ * Return:
>> >+ * * -EINVAL - Section already deactived.
>> >+ * * 0 - Subsection map is emptied.
>> >+ * * 1 - Subsection map is not empty.
>> >+ */
>> >+static int clear_subsection_map(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages)
>> > {
>> > DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
>> > DECLARE_BITMAP(tmp, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION) = { 0 };
>> > struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>> >- bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
>> >- struct page *memmap = NULL;
>> > unsigned long *subsection_map = ms->usage
>> > ? &ms->usage->subsection_map[0] : NULL;
>> >
>> >@@ -744,8 +755,28 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> > if (WARN(!subsection_map || !bitmap_equal(tmp, map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION),
>> > "section already deactivated (%#lx + %ld)\n",
>> > pfn, nr_pages))
>> >- return;
>> >+ return -EINVAL;
>> >+
>> >+ bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
>> >
>> >+ if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION))
>> >+ return 0;
>> >+
>> >+ return 1;
>> >+}
>> >+
>> >+static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> >+ struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
>> >+{
>> >+ struct mem_section *ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
>> >+ bool section_is_early = early_section(ms);
>> >+ struct page *memmap = NULL;
>> >+ int rc;
>> >+
>> >+
>> >+ rc = clear_subsection_map(pfn, nr_pages);
>> >+ if(IS_ERR_VALUE((unsigned long)rc))
>> >+ return;
>> > /*
>> > * There are 3 cases to handle across two configurations
>> > * (SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n}):
>> >@@ -763,8 +794,7 @@ static void section_deactivate(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
>> > *
>> > * For 2/ and 3/ the SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP={y,n} cases are unified
>> > */
>> >- bitmap_xor(subsection_map, map, subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION);
>> >- if (bitmap_empty(subsection_map, SUBSECTIONS_PER_SECTION)) {
>> >+ if (!rc) {
>> > unsigned long section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
>> >
>> > /*
>> >--
>> >2.17.2
>>
>> --
>> Wei Yang
>> Help you, Help me
>>
--
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-10 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-09 10:48 [PATCH 0/7] mm/hotplug: Only use subsection in VMEMMAP case and fix hot add/remove failure in SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case Baoquan He
2020-02-09 10:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm/sparse.c: Introduce new function fill_subsection_map() Baoquan He
2020-02-09 23:05 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-09 23:11 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-10 3:25 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-10 9:49 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-11 12:46 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-11 14:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-12 11:21 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-09 10:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm/sparse.c: Introduce a new function clear_subsection_map() Baoquan He
2020-02-09 23:07 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-10 3:36 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-10 6:02 ` Wei Yang [this message]
2020-02-09 10:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm/sparse.c: only use subsection map in VMEMMAP case Baoquan He
2020-02-09 23:23 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-11 14:43 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-12 11:26 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-11 20:14 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-12 9:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-12 11:20 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-12 15:48 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-09 10:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm/sparse.c: Use __get_free_pages() instead in populate_section_memmap() Baoquan He
2020-02-09 23:39 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-09 10:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm/sparse.c: update code comment about section activate/deactivate Baoquan He
2020-02-09 10:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm/sparsemem: pfn_to_page is not valid yet on SPARSEMEM Baoquan He
2020-02-10 3:45 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-09 10:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm/hotplug: fix hot remove failure in SPARSEMEM|!VMEMMAP case Baoquan He
2020-02-09 23:52 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-10 3:41 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-10 6:08 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-10 7:54 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-10 23:05 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200210060253.GE7326@richard \
--to=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.