From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Stuart Hayes <stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
Cc: Austin Bolen <austin_bolen@dell.com>,
keith.busch@intel.com, Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>,
Oza Pawandeep <poza@codeaurora.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
lukas@wunner.de, Libor Pechacek <lpechacek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] PCI: pciehp: Do not turn off slot if presence comes up after link
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 18:08:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200211000816.GA89075@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191025190047.38130-1-stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com>
[+cc Libor (thanks for the ping!)]
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 03:00:44PM -0400, Stuart Hayes wrote:
> In older PCIe specs, PDS (presence detect) would come up when the
> "in-band" presence detect pin connected, and would be up before DLLLA
> (link active).
>
> In PCIe 4.0 (as an ECN) and in PCIe 5.0, there is a new bit to show if
> in-band presence detection can be disabled for the slot, and another bit
> that disables it--and a recommendation that it should be disabled if it
> can be. In addition, certain OEMs disable in-band presence detection
> without implementing these bits.
>
> This means it is possible to get a "card present" interrupt after the
> link is up and the driver is loaded. This causes an erroneous removal
> of the device driver, followed by an immediate re-probing.
>
> This patch set defines these new bits, uses them to disable in-band
> presence detection if it can be, waits for PDS to go up if in-band
> presence detection is disabled, and adds a DMI table that will let us
> know if we should assume in-band presence is disabled on a system.
>
> The first two patches in this set come from a patch set that was
> submitted but not accepted many months ago by Alexandru Gagniuc [1].
> The first is unmodified, the second has the commit message and timeout
> modified.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10909167/
> [v3,0/4] PCI: pciehp: Do not turn off slot if presence comes up after link
>
> v2:
> - modify loop in pcie_wait_for_presence to do..while
>
> v3:
> - remove unused variable declaration
> - modify text of warning message
>
> v4:
> - remove "!!" boolean conversion in an "if" condition for readability
> - add explanation comment in dmi table
>
> Alexandru Gagniuc (2):
> PCI: pciehp: Add support for disabling in-band presence
> PCI: pciehp: Wait for PDS if in-band presence is disabled
>
> Stuart Hayes (1):
> PCI: pciehp: Add dmi table for in-band presence disabled
>
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp.h | 1 +
> drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I added the spec reference to the 1/3 commit log, tried to make the
tweaks Lukas suggested (interdiff below), used ctrl_info() instead of
pci_info() (I would actually like to change the whole driver to use
pci_info(), but better to be consistent for now), and applied to
pci/hotplug for v5.7.
Somebody should also update lspci to:
- Do something with DevCap AttnBtn, AttnInd, PwrInd to indicate that
they were only defined for PCIe r1.0 and have been explicitly
undefined since then. If there's a way to identify those 1.0
devices and only decode those fields for 1.0, that would be nice.
- Add SltCap2 and SltCtrl2 decoding.
Speak up if you plan to do this so we don't duplicate effort.
Bjorn
diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
index ae0108b92084..469873b44a8e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_hpc.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static void pcie_wait_for_presence(struct pci_dev *pdev)
timeout -= 10;
} while (timeout > 0);
- pci_info(pdev, "Timeout waiting for Presence Detect state to be set\n");
+ ctrl_info(ctrl, "Timeout waiting for Presence Detect\n");
}
int pciehp_check_link_status(struct controller *ctrl)
@@ -921,6 +921,16 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
ctrl->state = list_empty(&subordinate->devices) ? OFF_STATE : ON_STATE;
up_read(&pci_bus_sem);
+ pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2, &slot_cap2);
+ if (slot_cap2 & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2_IBPD) {
+ pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_IBPD_DISABLE,
+ PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_IBPD_DISABLE);
+ ctrl->inband_presence_disabled = 1;
+ }
+
+ if (dmi_first_match(inband_presence_disabled_dmi_table))
+ ctrl->inband_presence_disabled = 1;
+
/* Check if Data Link Layer Link Active Reporting is implemented */
pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &link_cap);
@@ -930,7 +940,7 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_MRLSC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_CC |
PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC);
- ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot #%d AttnBtn%c PwrCtrl%c MRL%c AttnInd%c PwrInd%c HotPlug%c Surprise%c Interlock%c NoCompl%c LLActRep%c%s\n",
+ ctrl_info(ctrl, "Slot #%d AttnBtn%c PwrCtrl%c MRL%c AttnInd%c PwrInd%c HotPlug%c Surprise%c Interlock%c NoCompl%c IbPresDis%c LLActRep%c%s\n",
(slot_cap & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PSN) >> 19,
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_ABP),
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_PCP),
@@ -941,19 +951,10 @@ struct controller *pcie_init(struct pcie_device *dev)
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_HPS),
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_EIP),
FLAG(slot_cap, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP_NCCS),
+ ctrl->inband_presence_disabled,
FLAG(link_cap, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_DLLLARC),
pdev->broken_cmd_compl ? " (with Cmd Compl erratum)" : "");
- pcie_capability_read_dword(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2, &slot_cap2);
- if (slot_cap2 & PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2_IBPD) {
- pcie_write_cmd_nowait(ctrl, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_IBPD_DISABLE,
- PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_IBPD_DISABLE);
- ctrl->inband_presence_disabled = 1;
- }
-
- if (dmi_first_match(inband_presence_disabled_dmi_table))
- ctrl->inband_presence_disabled = 1;
-
/*
* If empty slot's power status is on, turn power off. The IRQ isn't
* requested yet, so avoid triggering a notification with this command.
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
index b464d2f76513..f9701410d3b5 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@
#define PCI_EXP_LNKSTA2 50 /* Link Status 2 */
#define PCI_CAP_EXP_ENDPOINT_SIZEOF_V2 52 /* v2 endpoints with link end here */
#define PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2 52 /* Slot Capabilities 2 */
-#define PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2_IBPD 0x0001 /* In-band PD Disable Supported */
+#define PCI_EXP_SLTCAP2_IBPD 0x00000001 /* In-band PD Disable Supported */
#define PCI_EXP_SLTCTL2 56 /* Slot Control 2 */
#define PCI_EXP_SLTSTA2 58 /* Slot Status 2 */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-11 0:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-25 19:00 [PATCH v4 0/3] PCI: pciehp: Do not turn off slot if presence comes up after link Stuart Hayes
2019-10-25 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] PCI: pciehp: Add support for disabling in-band presence Stuart Hayes
2019-10-25 19:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-11-27 1:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-11-27 2:19 ` Stuart Hayes
2019-12-31 22:06 ` Stuart Hayes
2020-01-29 13:15 ` Libor Pechacek
2019-10-25 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] PCI: pciehp: Wait for PDS if in-band presence is disabled Stuart Hayes
2019-10-25 19:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2019-10-25 19:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] PCI: pciehp: Add dmi table for in-band presence disabled Stuart Hayes
2019-10-25 19:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-21 5:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-21 17:46 ` Stuart Hayes
2019-10-28 11:31 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] PCI: pciehp: Do not turn off slot if presence comes up after link Mika Westerberg
2020-02-08 20:22 ` Lukas Wunner
2020-02-11 0:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-02-11 4:49 ` Lukas Wunner
2020-02-11 14:14 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-11 14:32 ` Lukas Wunner
2020-02-11 19:31 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-02-18 17:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200211000816.GA89075@google.com \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=austin_bolen@dell.com \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpechacek@suse.cz \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mr.nuke.me@gmail.com \
--cc=okaya@kernel.org \
--cc=poza@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stuart.w.hayes@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.