From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFC2C352A3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C338420661 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ntYGo580" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C338420661 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7916D4AECC; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:34 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@kernel.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qXqVAl1tKmG; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31904AEDC; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:30 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C92E4A97D for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:29 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xDkdosQNTdVm for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D92D94AEBF for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0577E20578; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581443547; bh=Hzwd2V5pNv8PurnC7nBw9dzDHuozYcO82FdEXCzVPDc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ntYGo580sRVgNxSH2Wx9nFcgMwRCmt/JHyEahIcC7AtbVUd+Nk/2baZ56MNCFr68M ixAuGX8i8kejHfokJENZXt0x6vDIfpYChf1MhWOicxGNUcxOeJgXs8awVy+vHJ/Ow9 3nN5Kn5DlJEQWibjMcicohaWtW++adz3WS1yHVLA= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j1Zfi-004O7k-AH; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:50:06 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 22/94] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:48:26 +0000 Message-Id: <20200211174938.27809-23-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Andre Przywara , Dave Martin X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu From: Jintack Lim VMs used to execute hvc #0 for the psci call if EL3 is not implemented. However, when we come to provide the virtual EL2 mode to the VM, the host OS inside the VM calls kvm_call_hyp() which is also hvc #0. So, it's hard to differentiate between them from the host hypervisor's point of view. So, let the VM execute smc instruction for the psci call. On ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, a smc instruction executed at non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than being treated as UNDEFINED. So, the host hypervisor can handle this psci call without any confusion. Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index c3398e6ebbbe..3ee5351b8561 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) { + int ret; + /* * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a @@ -70,10 +72,28 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) * * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would * otherwise return to the same address... + * + * If imm is non-zero, it's not defined, so just skip it. + */ + if (kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu)) { + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); + return 1; + } + + /* + * If imm is zero, it's a psci call. + * Note that on ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, SMC executed + * at Non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than + * being treated as UNDEFINED. */ - vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + ret = kvm_hvc_call_handler(vcpu); + if (ret < 0) + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); - return 1; + + return ret; } /* -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C839FC35242 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A534A206DB for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="r8sOp5d8"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ntYGo580" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A534A206DB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=3h8mWz1Z3zd2kmnqmJWVHLikZ2ndZjVLexZAWvGkci4=; b=r8sOp5d8rJNJD6 mbbl6wudwrruPa3iNEa80fP2r2eXP+yS5KEf4zfkmqWI9rAvCLF5M9pB6Tz/ujnQD53hsM7WX9Rv5 9U/BuDeKzyV/bPBE68p7o0Fx5cQWcRO1lKEKrA6y4z0eVdCz0tr7+UaUqTH3QgedakzbJcWAOveKl +Dd2lYXbUmhY3hYcnxhNkY0Z7aQ63YPMko0buEr7hTs2RxQbYT0R3O6boFn7g/n/k+nBeVv1PZg+z Wf/HMK2i95k2mMnsfotRfRQI6GIe2KKWPAb6OwGgOyUuohKiBzRFDqspqkTn21PS9JcS9AXFEdKGf D1Z1q5RRzeS+9W2kQYJQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j1Zw0-0002Du-J6; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 18:06:56 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j1Zhz-0002Sd-JJ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:29 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0577E20578; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581443547; bh=Hzwd2V5pNv8PurnC7nBw9dzDHuozYcO82FdEXCzVPDc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ntYGo580sRVgNxSH2Wx9nFcgMwRCmt/JHyEahIcC7AtbVUd+Nk/2baZ56MNCFr68M ixAuGX8i8kejHfokJENZXt0x6vDIfpYChf1MhWOicxGNUcxOeJgXs8awVy+vHJ/Ow9 3nN5Kn5DlJEQWibjMcicohaWtW++adz3WS1yHVLA= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j1Zfi-004O7k-AH; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:50:06 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v2 22/94] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:48:26 +0000 Message-Id: <20200211174938.27809-23-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200211_095227_698808_BBB6D16B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.54 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Suzuki K Poulose , Andre Przywara , Christoffer Dall , Dave Martin , James Morse , Alexandru Elisei , Jintack Lim , Julien Thierry Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org From: Jintack Lim VMs used to execute hvc #0 for the psci call if EL3 is not implemented. However, when we come to provide the virtual EL2 mode to the VM, the host OS inside the VM calls kvm_call_hyp() which is also hvc #0. So, it's hard to differentiate between them from the host hypervisor's point of view. So, let the VM execute smc instruction for the psci call. On ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, a smc instruction executed at non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than being treated as UNDEFINED. So, the host hypervisor can handle this psci call without any confusion. Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index c3398e6ebbbe..3ee5351b8561 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) { + int ret; + /* * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a @@ -70,10 +72,28 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) * * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would * otherwise return to the same address... + * + * If imm is non-zero, it's not defined, so just skip it. + */ + if (kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu)) { + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); + return 1; + } + + /* + * If imm is zero, it's a psci call. + * Note that on ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, SMC executed + * at Non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than + * being treated as UNDEFINED. */ - vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + ret = kvm_hvc_call_handler(vcpu); + if (ret < 0) + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); - return 1; + + return ret; } /* -- 2.20.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B9CC352A3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC55206CC for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581443548; bh=Hzwd2V5pNv8PurnC7nBw9dzDHuozYcO82FdEXCzVPDc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=Cbgc5w1qbIieqE1+1WrBZg9yrCwOflJlWdPM7Agbgss4LXPj8ploFf1rXMSMUQUZS QwomviYly8gVmcgmvV/s69ZNiCpa3hsOR2PIrsGxDN5HYN1lRYemMR0tsP13nIwBYc 2M5vuXv3S6h1R+iXZQIsIKdb7gNhSS9OYRV+NzGo= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730536AbgBKRw2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:28 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55396 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730485AbgBKRw1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:52:27 -0500 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0577E20578; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:52:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581443547; bh=Hzwd2V5pNv8PurnC7nBw9dzDHuozYcO82FdEXCzVPDc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=ntYGo580sRVgNxSH2Wx9nFcgMwRCmt/JHyEahIcC7AtbVUd+Nk/2baZ56MNCFr68M ixAuGX8i8kejHfokJENZXt0x6vDIfpYChf1MhWOicxGNUcxOeJgXs8awVy+vHJ/Ow9 3nN5Kn5DlJEQWibjMcicohaWtW++adz3WS1yHVLA= Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=why.lan) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j1Zfi-004O7k-AH; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:50:06 +0000 From: Marc Zyngier To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Cc: Andre Przywara , Christoffer Dall , Dave Martin , Jintack Lim , Alexandru Elisei , James Morse , Julien Thierry , Suzuki K Poulose Subject: [PATCH v2 22/94] KVM: arm64: nv: Handle PSCI call via smc from the guest Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:48:26 +0000 Message-Id: <20200211174938.27809-23-maz@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org> References: <20200211174938.27809-1-maz@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, andre.przywara@arm.com, christoffer.dall@arm.com, Dave.Martin@arm.com, jintack@cs.columbia.edu, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org From: Jintack Lim VMs used to execute hvc #0 for the psci call if EL3 is not implemented. However, when we come to provide the virtual EL2 mode to the VM, the host OS inside the VM calls kvm_call_hyp() which is also hvc #0. So, it's hard to differentiate between them from the host hypervisor's point of view. So, let the VM execute smc instruction for the psci call. On ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, a smc instruction executed at non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than being treated as UNDEFINED. So, the host hypervisor can handle this psci call without any confusion. Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier --- arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c index c3398e6ebbbe..3ee5351b8561 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) { + int ret; + /* * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a @@ -70,10 +72,28 @@ static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) * * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would * otherwise return to the same address... + * + * If imm is non-zero, it's not defined, so just skip it. + */ + if (kvm_vcpu_hvc_get_imm(vcpu)) { + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); + return 1; + } + + /* + * If imm is zero, it's a psci call. + * Note that on ARMv8.3, even if EL3 is not implemented, SMC executed + * at Non-secure EL1 is trapped to EL2 if HCR_EL2.TSC==1, rather than + * being treated as UNDEFINED. */ - vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + ret = kvm_hvc_call_handler(vcpu); + if (ret < 0) + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL); + kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)); - return 1; + + return ret; } /* -- 2.20.1