From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mika Westerberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/18] platform/x86: intel_scu_ipc: Log more information if SCU IPC command fails Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:57:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20200212115717.GA2667@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20200211132603.73509-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20200211132603.73509-3-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20200211154138.GE10400@smile.fi.intel.com> <20200212113649.GV2667@lahna.fi.intel.com> <20200212115442.GS10400@smile.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200212115442.GS10400@smile.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Darren Hart , Lee Jones , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Zha Qipeng , "David E . Box" , Guenter Roeck , Heikki Krogerus , Wim Van Sebroeck , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 01:54:42PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > You mean move outside of the lock? This one calls ipc_data_readl() > > which should be under the lock. > > I meant to move dev_err() out of the lock. The rest of course requires to stay > under it. OK, got it :)