From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (yocto-www.yoctoproject.org [140.211.169.56]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.1686.1581553138379159256 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:18:58 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=QtLaHEC1; spf=softfail (domain: gmail.com, ip: 140.211.169.56, mailfrom: twoerner@gmail.com) Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id D2AD8E0164D; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:18:57 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at https://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.160.171 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid Received: from mail-qt1-f171.google.com (mail-qt1-f171.google.com [209.85.160.171]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD562E015FF for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:18:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d18so3103439qtj.10 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:18:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=xbd39QNrXZe+iBCfcCOpc8R/FHlJ+tPaIxV8oivrOnU=; b=QtLaHEC1PsSKgExt52XFhaCQWsAcwAqlBzFLcNJaGYrPKm7xvt+s2wR8OVuolh1u7d d0vezfnu0rf2mWrrzoGd5Rr28g3tthXHJ3WHk5u6M2k6C3A3jsYb3bSq7Igf78c/bVY5 KJBU/2bTtjCatHX3kF1dWp9Amzn+vm//F/Cv4TUs4qxgAnJTUlYVVjSlidawfnk7qOaz Inj3/9jOyop87DM/s8Ocfvd0BlVf9h/Tbbb5iqrIJkehbERi0kWt03CKAi6ABt7bxDdw FTjE2TwZv6Ly2TGRNYExXx9Dpm9AqA5l6sv7eeLQIbEKky8qaK3TTn1S6V5xaL4715ev a3YA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=xbd39QNrXZe+iBCfcCOpc8R/FHlJ+tPaIxV8oivrOnU=; b=k7cEok6uN3Uw3y+0vEMS4ktG9L8ROB/nD8buhk51s3wa3xtwR0U1Q7kq3O6YreC+ag /7/6UFWGhV1HZimS3NlEpPHKQkie6FVzW5Y65KJHqbdd8lCglHtNUdIyH3IBXWk+isyA I8IIRCo4N7ZAJSHd1VeY2wnTu30kC4HGBMCN/2G4wGQEYilfZDuCkYi8sI8gj/EQ1EWi xMajUJ5M7WNlgIcienHPzF4uDeBo2DAUkk+wyVkR2eorDIxC6EobHDeJ+s77hbkCruJ2 9tW8ZcWHSj5Wl013FCemyOcD2A8BRZ/LFF7h6W9OOtzwlPkP0KHAMKO/2ZYnSQtQnZKx 7E8g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWRxpbN7qUZqNpXYHrG23AmPg+UFWwDSb5aM4wo1yl4iIoIBfG IS569vslAAt7dBJIArdhb/z03Tj+gfw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyEiIN3lYTVJHvd7Axe3eW185Bk/a1PkQxwLNxRA4fyAK/idd5uNmSKpWgUlqe53yN82s43JA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:3602:: with SMTP id m2mr9255527qtb.356.1581553134765; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux-uys3 ([206.248.190.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h6sm484973qtr.33.2020.02.12.16.18.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:18:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 19:18:50 -0500 From: "Trevor Woerner" To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org Subject: old ARM9 hardware gathering dust Message-ID: <20200213001849.GA39501@linux-uys3> MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I know this is a long shot... I've been doing quite a lot of work recently with some older, ARM926ej-s, hardware (specifically the lpc32xx) and have become rather interested in other such systems (aka ARM9, ARMv5, ARM926ej-s, ...). Is there any chance someone listening on this list might have, perhaps, an imx23evk or an imx28evk sitting on their shelf gathering dust that they know they'll never use again? If so I'd be interested in purchasing it (for a reasonable price) and acting as the maintainer of such devices (should Otavio be interested in giving up maintainership of these MACHINEs). Thoughts, offers? Best regards, Trevor