From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Alexander Krupp <centos@akr.yagii.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mce: Do not log spurious corrected mce errors
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 07:34:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200214123407.4184-1-prarit@redhat.com> (raw)
Alex has reported that he is seeing spurious corrected errors on
his hardware.
Intel Errata HSD131, HSM142, HSW131, and BDM48 report that
"spurious corrected errors may be logged in the IA32_MC0_STATUS register
with the valid field (bit 63) set, the uncorrected error field (bit 61)
not set, a Model Specific Error Code (bits [31:16]) of 0x000F, and
an MCA Error Code (bits [15:0]) of 0x0005."
Block these spurious errors from the console and logs.
Links to Intel Specification updates:
HSD131: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/docs/processors/core/4th-gen-core-family-desktop-specification-update.html
HSM142: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/docs/processors/core/4th-gen-core-family-mobile-specification-update.html
HSW131: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/xeon/xeon-e3-1200v3-spec-update.html
BDM48: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/docs/processors/core/5th-gen-core-family-spec-update.html
Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Co-developed-by: Alexander Krupp <centos@akr.yagii.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 2 ++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/internal.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
index 2c4f949611e4..fe3983d551cc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c
@@ -1877,6 +1877,8 @@ bool filter_mce(struct mce *m)
{
if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
return amd_filter_mce(m);
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)
+ return intel_filter_mce(m);
return false;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c
index 5627b1091b85..989148e6746c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/intel.c
@@ -520,3 +520,20 @@ void mce_intel_feature_clear(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
{
intel_clear_lmce();
}
+
+bool intel_filter_mce(struct mce *m)
+{
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &boot_cpu_data;
+
+ /* MCE errata HSD131, HSM142, HSW131, BDM48, and HSM142 */
+ if ((c->x86 == 6) &&
+ ((c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL) ||
+ (c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_L) ||
+ (c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL) ||
+ (c->x86_model == INTEL_FAM6_HASWELL_G)) &&
+ (m->bank == 0) &&
+ ((m->status & 0xa0000000ffffffff) == 0x80000000000f0005))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/internal.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/internal.h
index b785c0d0b590..2729db355b36 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/internal.h
@@ -172,8 +172,10 @@ extern bool filter_mce(struct mce *m);
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE_AMD
extern bool amd_filter_mce(struct mce *m);
+extern bool intel_filter_mce(struct mce *m);
#else
static inline bool amd_filter_mce(struct mce *m) { return false; };
+static inline bool intel_filter_mce(struct mce *m) { return false; };
#endif
#endif /* __X86_MCE_INTERNAL_H__ */
--
2.21.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 12:34 Prarit Bhargava [this message]
2020-02-14 17:36 ` [PATCH] x86/mce: Do not log spurious corrected mce errors Luck, Tony
2020-02-14 21:29 ` Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200214123407.4184-1-prarit@redhat.com \
--to=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=centos@akr.yagii.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.