From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7153C3B1A6 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D283206CC for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="esbgs32X" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4D283206CC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=atomide.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A49CB1686; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:06:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz A49CB1686 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1581700026; bh=KRlR803jVoxJ8CTZdZQEiAATY7ETRmDhQCF+L5F5lkc=; h=Date:From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=esbgs32XihM7X7Ug/NqWVPEzdO+Ihx6xh/1EmdMw9J9ccktVYoBItEiuM8KhQF+yB jpkNBgLMt+99cMRQEYNJl2cn8TXJUpXld4ok/IQT+K3ioWHGFD8c0DVomNZc33wtOh Z1Iu4UqPxN/OOrX+Vlnw9vs7h0ix8hxqw8+UyqIQ= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2198FF80138; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:06:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id DF782F8013E; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:06:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from muru.com (muru.com [72.249.23.125]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFE3F80086 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 18:06:04 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 6DFE3F80086 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2AC80E7; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:05:59 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Mark Brown Message-ID: <20200214170559.GA64767@atomide.com> References: <20200211171645.41990-1-tony@atomide.com> <20200212143543.GI64767@atomide.com> <346dfd2b-23f8-87e0-6f45-27a5099b1066@ti.com> <20200214124920.GH4827@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200214124920.GH4827@sirena.org.uk> Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Kuninori Morimoto , Aaro Koskinen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Merlijn Wajer , Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , Peter Ujfalusi , Pavel Machek , Sebastian Reichel , "Arthur D ." , Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: ti: Allocate dais dynamically for TDM and audio graph card X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" * Mark Brown [200214 12:50]: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > On 12/02/2020 16.35, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Oops, that's not good. So should we just keep the old naming if there's > > > only one endpoint? > > > That's an option, yes, if we really need extra dummy McBSP DAIs at all, > > again, let's hear from Morimoto-san or Mark. > > We really shouldn't need dummy DAIs at all I think, if we do it feels > like there's a problem. It's quite possible that there is actually a > problem here though... It's dummy in the droid4 voice call case as mcbsp is not the clock-master and there's nothing to configure for mcbsp. But I guess in some cases mcbsp could be the clock-master and then the secondary DAI would have ops. I could be wrong though, this is just based on my experience with getting one device working. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAB2C2BA83 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFEB20637 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394427AbgBNRGE (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:06:04 -0500 Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:55252 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394058AbgBNRGE (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:06:04 -0500 Received: from atomide.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muru.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2AC80E7; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 09:05:59 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Mark Brown Cc: Peter Ujfalusi , Kuninori Morimoto , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Aaro Koskinen , "Arthur D ." , Jarkko Nikula , Merlijn Wajer , Pavel Machek , Sebastian Reichel Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: ti: Allocate dais dynamically for TDM and audio graph card Message-ID: <20200214170559.GA64767@atomide.com> References: <20200211171645.41990-1-tony@atomide.com> <20200212143543.GI64767@atomide.com> <346dfd2b-23f8-87e0-6f45-27a5099b1066@ti.com> <20200214124920.GH4827@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200214124920.GH4827@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Mark Brown [200214 12:50]: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 02:41:30PM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > > On 12/02/2020 16.35, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Oops, that's not good. So should we just keep the old naming if there's > > > only one endpoint? > > > That's an option, yes, if we really need extra dummy McBSP DAIs at all, > > again, let's hear from Morimoto-san or Mark. > > We really shouldn't need dummy DAIs at all I think, if we do it feels > like there's a problem. It's quite possible that there is actually a > problem here though... It's dummy in the droid4 voice call case as mcbsp is not the clock-master and there's nothing to configure for mcbsp. But I guess in some cases mcbsp could be the clock-master and then the secondary DAI would have ops. I could be wrong though, this is just based on my experience with getting one device working. Regards, Tony