From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:20:50 -0500
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20200214192050.GD18654@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [Virtio-fs] virtiofs on top of overlayfs
List-Id: Development discussions about virtio-fs <virtio-fs.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/virtio-fs>,
	<mailto:virtio-fs-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/virtio-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:virtio-fs@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:virtio-fs-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/virtio-fs>,
	<mailto:virtio-fs-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
To: virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>, eric.ernst@intel.com
Cc: Mrunal Patel <mpatel@redhat.com>, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>

Hi Eric,

Was talking to Mrunal and he said you mentioned that virtiofs on top of
overlayfs has some issues.

I can't remember any issues and thought it should just work. Would you
remember the specific issue you faced with this configuraiton.

Have kata continaers tried using virtiofs on top overlayfs.

Thanks
Vivek