All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Lehmann <schmorp@schmorp.de>
To: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cpu bound I/O behaviour in linux 5.4 (possibly others)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:07:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200214200659.GA7612@schmorp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL3q7H7SPyXB+5G6+XtgfviJdBQQSYD1YyJZPX6rbWxhes-+qw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 12:20:46PM +0000, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> wrote:
> So you can't deduce that the free space cache is being used, and
> despite being the default, it was not mentioned by Marc if he's not
> using already the free space tree (-o space_cache=v2).

Today, during an idle period, I stopped the news process, waited 15
minutes for I/O tand CPU to become mostly idle, and did this:

   # mount -noremount,clear_cache,space_cache=v1 /localvol5
   # mount -noremount,clear_cache,space_cache=v2 /localvol5

Which, to my surprise, didn't make btrfs complain too much:

   [1378546.558533] BTRFS info (device dm-17): force clearing of disk cache
   [1378546.558536] BTRFS info (device dm-17): enabling disk space caching
   [1378546.558537] BTRFS info (device dm-17): disk space caching is enabled

   [1378553.868438] BTRFS info (device dm-17): enabling free space tree
   [1378553.868440] BTRFS info (device dm-17): using free space tree

I don't know if this was effective in clearing the cache, but it didn't
change the behaviour - as soon as the new process started writing files
again, it was at 100% cpu.

-- 
                The choice of a       Deliantra, the free code+content MORPG
      -----==-     _GNU_              http://www.deliantra.net
      ----==-- _       generation
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __      Marc Lehmann
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /      schmorp@schmorp.de
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-14 20:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-14 11:30 cpu bound I/O behaviour in linux 5.4 (possibly others) Marc Lehmann
2020-02-14 11:57 ` Nikolay Borisov
2020-02-14 12:20   ` Filipe Manana
2020-02-14 20:07     ` Marc Lehmann [this message]
2020-02-14 12:40   ` Marc Lehmann
2020-02-14 12:36 ` Roman Mamedov
2020-02-14 12:45   ` Marc Lehmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200214200659.GA7612@schmorp.de \
    --to=schmorp@schmorp.de \
    --cc=fdmanana@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.