All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@dlink.ru>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>,
	linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma] IB/mlx5: Fix linkage failure on 32-bit arches
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:36:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200217003610.GC31668@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3c70c7da-60aa-10ec-767f-5e519357b8e6@mellanox.com>

On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 01:53:50PM +0200, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> On 2020-02-14 21:44, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > Jason Gunthorpe wrote 14.02.2020 22:24:
> > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:13:09PM +0300, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> > > > Commit f164be8c0366 ("IB/mlx5: Extend caps stage to handle VAR
> > > > capabilities") introduced a straight "/" division of the u64
> > > > variable "bar_size", which emits an __udivdi3() libgcc call on
> > > > 32-bit arches and certain GCC versions:
> > > > 
> > > > error: "__udivdi3" [drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.ko]
> > > > undefined! [1]
> > > > 
> > > > Replace it with the corresponding div_u64() call.
> > > > Compile-tested on ARCH=mips 32r2el_defconfig BOARDS=ocelot.
> > > > 
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/CAMuHMdXM9S1VkFMZ8eDAyZR6EE4WkJY215Lcn2qdOaPeadF+EQ@mail.gmail.com/
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: f164be8c0366 ("IB/mlx5: Extend caps stage to handle VAR
> > > > capabilities")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@dlink.ru>
> > > >  drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c | 3 ++-
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > Randy beat you too it..
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rdma/20200206143201.GF25297@ziepe.ca/
> > 
> > Ah, OK. Sorry for missing this one. I didn't see any fix over
> > git.kernel.org and thought it doesn't exist yet.
> > 
> > > But it seems patchwork missed this somehow.
> > > 
> > > Applied now at least
> 
> Jason, I think Alexander's patch is more correct. It uses div_u64, while
> yours uses div64_u64. The divider is 32-bit, so div_u64 would be more
> optimized on most 32-bit architectures.

Seems so, but it is already done. You can send a followup to fix it

Jason

      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-17  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-14 19:13 [PATCH rdma] IB/mlx5: Fix linkage failure on 32-bit arches Alexander Lobakin
2020-02-14 19:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-02-14 19:44   ` Alexander Lobakin
2020-02-16 11:53     ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2020-02-17  0:36       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200217003610.GC31668@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=alobakin@dlink.ru \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maximmi@mellanox.com \
    --cc=yishaih@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.