From: Florian Westphal <fw at strlen.de>
To: mptcp at lists.01.org
Subject: [MPTCP] [PATCH v3 5/6] mptcp: protocol: re-check dsn before reading from subflow
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:21:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200218122110.23817-6-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200218122110.23817-1-fw@strlen.de
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1779 bytes --]
mptcp_subflow_data_available() is commonly called via
ssk->sk_data_ready(), in this case the mptcp socket lock
cannot be acquired.
Therefore, while we can safely discard subflow data that
was already received up to msk->ack_seq, we cannot be sure
that 'subflow->data_avail' will still be valid at the time
userspace wants to read the data -- a previous read on a
different subflow might have carried this data already.
In that (unlikely) event, msk->ack_seq will have been updated
and will be ahead of the subflow dsn.
We can check for this condition and skip/resync to the expected
sequence number.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw(a)strlen.de>
---
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 75ae03931963..02aba8b31f1f 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -205,8 +205,24 @@ static struct sock *mptcp_subflow_recv_lookup(const struct mptcp_sock *msk)
sock_owned_by_me(sk);
mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
- if (subflow->data_avail)
- return mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+ if (subflow->data_avail) {
+ struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+ u64 dsn = mptcp_subflow_get_mapped_dsn(subflow);
+
+ /* revalidate data sequence number.
+ *
+ * mptcp_subflow_data_available() is usually called
+ * without msk lock. Its unlikely (but possible)
+ * that msk->ack_seq has been advanced since the last
+ * call found in-sequence data.
+ */
+ if (likely(dsn == msk->ack_seq))
+ return ssk;
+
+ subflow->data_avail = 0;
+ if (mptcp_subflow_data_available(ssk))
+ return ssk;
+ }
}
return NULL;
--
2.24.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-18 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-18 12:21 Florian Westphal [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-20 14:34 [MPTCP] [PATCH v3 5/6] mptcp: protocol: re-check dsn before reading from subflow Florian Westphal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200218122110.23817-6-fw@strlen.de \
--to=unknown@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.