From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, mihajlov@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 13/16] s390x: protvirt: Move IO control structures over SIDA
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:56:35 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220125638.7241-14-frankja@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220125638.7241-1-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
For protected guests, we need to put the IO emulation results into the
SIDA, so SIE will write them into the guest at the next entry.
Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
---
target/s390x/ioinst.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
index e4102430aa..330b04d79a 100644
--- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
+++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
@@ -129,9 +129,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_msch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
return;
}
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &schib, sizeof(schib))) {
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
- return;
+ if (env->pv) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, &schib, sizeof(schib));
+ } else {
+ if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &schib, sizeof(schib))) {
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ return;
+ }
}
if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid) ||
!ioinst_schib_valid(&schib)) {
@@ -186,9 +190,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_ssch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_SPECIFICATION, ra);
return;
}
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb))) {
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
- return;
+ if (env->pv) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb));
+ } else {
+ if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, ar, &orig_orb, sizeof(orb))) {
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ return;
+ }
}
copy_orb_from_guest(&orb, &orig_orb);
if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid) ||
@@ -222,14 +230,19 @@ void ioinst_handle_stcrw(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
cc = css_do_stcrw(&crw);
/* 0 - crw stored, 1 - zeroes stored */
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &crw, sizeof(crw)) == 0) {
+ if (env->pv) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &crw, sizeof(crw));
setcc(cpu, cc);
} else {
- if (cc == 0) {
- /* Write failed: requeue CRW since STCRW is suppressing */
- css_undo_stcrw(&crw);
+ if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &crw, sizeof(crw)) == 0) {
+ setcc(cpu, cc);
+ } else {
+ if (cc == 0) {
+ /* Write failed: requeue CRW since STCRW is suppressing */
+ css_undo_stcrw(&crw);
+ }
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
}
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
}
}
@@ -251,6 +264,9 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
}
if (ioinst_disassemble_sch_ident(reg1, &m, &cssid, &ssid, &schid)) {
+ if (env->pv) {
+ return;
+ }
/*
* As operand exceptions have a lower priority than access exceptions,
* we check whether the memory area is writeable (injecting the
@@ -283,14 +299,19 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
}
}
if (cc != 3) {
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &schib,
- sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
- return;
+ if (env->pv) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &schib, sizeof(schib));
+ } else {
+ if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &schib,
+ sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ return;
+ }
}
} else {
/* Access exceptions have a higher priority than cc3 */
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
+ if (!env->pv &&
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib)) != 0) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return;
}
@@ -327,15 +348,20 @@ int ioinst_handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
}
/* 0 - status pending, 1 - not status pending, 3 - not operational */
if (cc != 3) {
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &irb, irb_len) != 0) {
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
- return -EFAULT;
+ if (env->pv) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr, &irb, irb_len);
+ } else {
+ if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, &irb, irb_len) != 0) {
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ return -EFAULT;
+ }
}
css_do_tsch_update_subch(sch);
} else {
irb_len = sizeof(irb) - sizeof(irb.emw);
/* Access exceptions have a higher priority than cc3 */
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, irb_len) != 0) {
+ if (!env->pv &&
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, irb_len) != 0) {
s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -633,9 +659,13 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
* present CHSC sub-handlers ... if we ever need more, we should take
* care of req->len here first.
*/
- if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, reg, buf, sizeof(ChscReq))) {
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
- return;
+ if (env->pv) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_read(cpu, addr, buf, sizeof(ChscReq));
+ } else {
+ if (s390_cpu_virt_mem_read(cpu, addr, reg, buf, sizeof(ChscReq))) {
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ return;
+ }
}
req = (ChscReq *)buf;
len = be16_to_cpu(req->len);
@@ -666,11 +696,16 @@ void ioinst_handle_chsc(S390CPU *cpu, uint32_t ipb, uintptr_t ra)
break;
}
- if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, reg, res,
- be16_to_cpu(res->len))) {
+ if (env->pv) {
+ s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, res, be16_to_cpu(res->len));
setcc(cpu, 0); /* Command execution complete */
} else {
- s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr + len, reg, res,
+ be16_to_cpu(res->len))) {
+ setcc(cpu, 0); /* Command execution complete */
+ } else {
+ s390_cpu_virt_mem_handle_exc(cpu, ra);
+ }
}
}
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 12:56 [PATCH v4 00/16] s390x: Protected Virtualization support Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] Sync pv Janosch Frank
2020-02-25 9:42 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 11:10 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] s390x: protvirt: Add diag308 subcodes 8 - 10 Janosch Frank
2020-02-21 9:49 ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-21 11:42 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] s390x: protvirt: Support unpack facility Janosch Frank
2020-02-24 14:13 ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-02-24 14:25 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] s390x: protvirt: Add migration blocker Janosch Frank
2020-02-25 9:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 11:21 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle diag 308 subcodes 0,1,3,4 Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] s390x: protvirt: KVM intercept changes Janosch Frank
2020-02-25 10:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 11:33 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] s390x: Add SIDA memory ops Janosch Frank
2020-02-25 9:59 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-25 11:27 ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] s390x: protvirt: Move STSI data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-02-25 10:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] s390x: protvirt: SCLP interpretation Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] s390x: protvirt: Set guest IPL PSW Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] s390x: protvirt: Move diag 308 data over SIDAD Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] s390x: protvirt: Disable address checks for PV guest IO emulation Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] s390x: protvirt: Handle SIGP store status correctly Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] s390x: Add unpack feature to GA1 Janosch Frank
2020-02-25 9:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-20 12:56 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] docs: Add protvirt docs Janosch Frank
2020-02-21 10:00 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200220125638.7241-14-frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=mihajlov@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-s390x@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.