From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] driver core: Fix driver_deferred_probe_check_state() logic
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 07:55:03 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220155503.GD955802@ripper> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220050440.45878-2-john.stultz@linaro.org>
On Wed 19 Feb 21:04 PST 2020, John Stultz wrote:
> driver_deferred_probe_check_state() has some uninituitive behavior.
>
> * From boot to late_initcall, it returns -EPROBE_DEFER
>
> * From late_initcall to the deferred_probe_timeout (if set)
> it returns -ENODEV
>
> * If the deferred_probe_timeout it set, after it fires, it
> returns -ETIMEDOUT
>
> This is a bit confusing, as its useful to have the function
> return -EPROBE_DEFER while the timeout is still running. This
> behavior has resulted in the somwhat duplicative
> driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue() function being
> added.
>
> Thus this patch tries to improve the logic, so that it behaves
> as such:
>
> * If deferred_probe_timeout is set, it returns -EPROBE_DEFER
> until the timeout, afterwhich it returns -ETIMEDOUT.
>
> * If deferred_probe_timeout is not set (-1), it returns
> -EPROBE_DEFER until late_initcall, after which it returns
>
> This will make the deferred_probe_timeout value much more
> functional, and will allow us to consolidate the
> driver_deferred_probe_check_state() and
> driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue() logic in a later
> patch.
>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> Change-Id: I8349b7a403ce8cbce485ea0a0a5512fddffb635c
Please drop the Change-Id.
> ---
> v4:
> * Simplified logic suggested by Andy Shevchenko
> * Clarified commit message to focus on logic change
> ---
> drivers/base/dd.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> index b25bcab2a26b..bb383dca39c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ __setup("deferred_probe_timeout=", deferred_probe_timeout_setup);
>
> static int __driver_deferred_probe_check_state(struct device *dev)
> {
> - if (!initcalls_done)
> + if (!initcalls_done || deferred_probe_timeout > 0)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> if (!deferred_probe_timeout) {
> @@ -252,9 +252,11 @@ static int __driver_deferred_probe_check_state(struct device *dev)
> * driver_deferred_probe_check_state() - Check deferred probe state
> * @dev: device to check
> *
> - * Returns -ENODEV if init is done and all built-in drivers have had a chance
> - * to probe (i.e. initcalls are done), -ETIMEDOUT if deferred probe debug
> - * timeout has expired, or -EPROBE_DEFER if none of those conditions are met.
> + * Returnes -EPROBE_DEFER if initcalls have not completed, or the deferred
As pointed out by Rafael, this should be Return:
With that addressed, you have my
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Regards,
Bjorn
> + * probe timeout is set, but not expried.
> + * Returns -ETIMEDOUT if the probe timeout was set and has expired.
> + * Returns -ENODEV if initcalls have completed and the deferred probe timeout
> + * was not set.
> *
> * Drivers or subsystems can opt-in to calling this function instead of directly
> * returning -EPROBE_DEFER.
> --
> 2.17.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 5:04 [PATCH v4 0/6] driver core: Try to improve and cleanup driver_deferred_probe_check_state() John Stultz
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] driver core: Fix driver_deferred_probe_check_state() logic John Stultz
2020-02-20 10:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-20 15:55 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2020-02-20 23:40 ` Pavel Machek
2020-02-20 23:42 ` John Stultz
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] driver core: Set deferred_probe_timeout to a longer default if CONFIG_MODULES is set John Stultz
2020-02-20 10:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-20 15:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] pinctrl: Remove use of driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue() John Stultz
2020-02-21 15:21 ` Linus Walleij
2020-02-21 17:19 ` John Stultz
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] driver core: Remove driver_deferred_probe_check_state_continue() John Stultz
2020-02-20 10:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-20 15:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] driver core: Rename deferred_probe_timeout and make it global John Stultz
2020-02-20 10:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-02-20 16:00 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 5:04 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] regulator: Use driver_deferred_probe_timeout for regulator_init_complete_work John Stultz
2020-02-20 16:05 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-02-20 10:15 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] driver core: Try to improve and cleanup driver_deferred_probe_check_state() Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200220155503.GD955802@ripper \
--to=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.