From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>,
Brian Geffon <bgeffon@google.com>,
Maya Gokhale <gokhale2@llnl.gov>,
Denis Plotnikov <dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
Marty McFadden <mcfadden8@llnl.gov>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Bobby Powers <bobbypowers@gmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v6 16/16] mm/userfaultfd: Honor FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE in fault path
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:03:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220160300.9941-1-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220155353.8676-1-peterx@redhat.com>
Userfaultfd fault path was by default killable even if the caller does
not have FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE. That makes sense before in that when
with gup we don't have FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE properly set before. Now
after previous patch we've got FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE applied even for
gup code so it should also make sense to let userfaultfd to honor the
FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE.
Because we're unconditionally setting FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE in gup code
right now, this patch should have no functional change. It also
cleaned the code a little bit by introducing some helpers.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index c076d3295958..703c1c3faa6e 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -334,6 +334,30 @@ static inline bool userfaultfd_must_wait(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
return ret;
}
+/* Should pair with userfaultfd_signal_pending() */
+static inline long userfaultfd_get_blocking_state(unsigned int flags)
+{
+ if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE)
+ return TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
+
+ if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE)
+ return TASK_KILLABLE;
+
+ return TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
+}
+
+/* Should pair with userfaultfd_get_blocking_state() */
+static inline bool userfaultfd_signal_pending(unsigned int flags)
+{
+ if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE)
+ return signal_pending(current);
+
+ if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_KILLABLE)
+ return fatal_signal_pending(current);
+
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* The locking rules involved in returning VM_FAULT_RETRY depending on
* FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY, FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT and
@@ -355,7 +379,7 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx;
struct userfaultfd_wait_queue uwq;
vm_fault_t ret = VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
- bool must_wait, return_to_userland;
+ bool must_wait;
long blocking_state;
/*
@@ -462,9 +486,7 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
uwq.ctx = ctx;
uwq.waken = false;
- return_to_userland = vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE;
- blocking_state = return_to_userland ? TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE :
- TASK_KILLABLE;
+ blocking_state = userfaultfd_get_blocking_state(vmf->flags);
spin_lock_irq(&ctx->fault_pending_wqh.lock);
/*
@@ -490,8 +512,7 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
if (likely(must_wait && !READ_ONCE(ctx->released) &&
- (return_to_userland ? !signal_pending(current) :
- !fatal_signal_pending(current)))) {
+ !userfaultfd_signal_pending(vmf->flags))) {
wake_up_poll(&ctx->fd_wqh, EPOLLIN);
schedule();
ret |= VM_FAULT_MAJOR;
@@ -513,8 +534,7 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
set_current_state(blocking_state);
if (READ_ONCE(uwq.waken) ||
READ_ONCE(ctx->released) ||
- (return_to_userland ? signal_pending(current) :
- fatal_signal_pending(current)))
+ userfaultfd_signal_pending(vmf->flags))
break;
schedule();
}
--
2.24.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 15:53 [PATCH RESEND v6 00/16] mm: Page fault enhancements Peter Xu
2020-02-20 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 01/16] mm/gup: Rename "nonblocking" to "locked" where proper Peter Xu
2020-02-20 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 02/16] mm/gup: Fix __get_user_pages() on fault retry of hugetlb Peter Xu
2020-03-02 19:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-02 20:07 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-02 20:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-20 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 03/16] mm: Introduce fault_signal_pending() Peter Xu
2020-03-02 19:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-20 15:53 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 04/16] x86/mm: Use helper fault_signal_pending() Peter Xu
2020-02-20 15:58 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 05/16] arc/mm: " Peter Xu
2020-02-20 15:59 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 06/16] arm64/mm: " Peter Xu
2020-02-20 16:02 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 07/16] powerpc/mm: " Peter Xu
2020-02-20 16:02 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 08/16] sh/mm: " Peter Xu
2020-02-20 16:02 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 09/16] mm: Return faster for non-fatal signals in user mode faults Peter Xu
2020-02-20 16:02 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 10/16] userfaultfd: Don't retake mmap_sem to emulate NOPAGE Peter Xu
2020-02-20 16:02 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 11/16] mm: Introduce FAULT_FLAG_DEFAULT Peter Xu
2020-02-20 16:02 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 13/16] mm: Allow VM_FAULT_RETRY for multiple times Peter Xu
2020-02-20 16:02 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 15/16] mm/gup: Allow to react to fatal signals Peter Xu
2020-02-20 16:03 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2020-02-20 19:53 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 12/16] mm: Introduce FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE Peter Xu
2020-02-20 19:53 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 14/16] mm/gup: Allow VM_FAULT_RETRY for multiple times Peter Xu
2020-02-21 19:26 ` [PATCH RESEND v6 00/16] mm: Page fault enhancements Brian Geffon
2020-03-02 17:31 ` Peter Xu
2020-02-21 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-21 20:11 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-07 20:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-07 21:47 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-08 12:12 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-09 19:51 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-09 20:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-08 12:49 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200220160300.9941-1-peterx@redhat.com \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=bgeffon@google.com \
--cc=bobbypowers@gmail.com \
--cc=cracauer@cons.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dplotnikov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=gokhale2@llnl.gov \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mcfadden8@llnl.gov \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xemul@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.